Member John-Erik
MemberForum Replies Created
-
In Michelson-Morley’s tests we must use the wave model since a collimator defines – and a telescope detects – constant orientation of wave front and the same wave front in both arms. So, no wave front tilting and no effect in the reference arm. Therefore, no time dilation – and Galilean transform. So, the twin paradox is just an illusion by a mistake from Potier. This happened between 1882 and 1887.
With best regards from ______________ John-Erik
-
Physics went wrong 140 years ago.
John-Erik
-
-
Fatio’s model is neutrino-like particles moving in all directions. They are absorbed to a small extent by matter. Therefore, fewer particles are leaving a body in relation to number of arriving particles. So, gravity is not a pushing and not a pulling force but a small difference between a pushing and a pulling force.
Newton’s model is not complete, since he derived the law by mathematics without observing that the law demands spherical symmetry on the body causing gravity. The model can be completed by splitting up a gravitating body in small volume elements, apply the model to each element and then integrate, so we no longer need spherical symmetry. The model becomes complete and can describe gravity. So, Newton’s model is only an approximation.
Newton’s completed model can be united with Fatio’s model by assuming matter to absorb ether particles and cause a small attenuation in the flow.
Newton’s mistake of not observing a mathematical demand means that he did not see that the idea Fatio sent to him could explain gravity by a radial ether wind equal to the escape velocity. Since the ether must contain mass this a natural behavior of ether in relation to other forms of matter.
With best regards from _________ John-Erik
-
Nature produces approximately spherical symmetry. This fact is hiding to us that there is a demand for perfect spherical symmetry,
Regards
-
Newton’s mistake gave us BIG BANG See below
-
The result of Newton’s mistake was BIG BANG
https://www.gsjournal.net/Science-Journals/Essays/View/8934
Regards
-
-
-
Sorry
should be can be united with Fatio’s model
-
Newton –> Fatio
Newton described an effect by mathematics. His model can be developed to be independent of the form of the gravitating body. Then the model can be united with Newton’s model.
Fatio explained a reason by physical arguments. Fatio regarded gravity as a falling ether. A falling ether around a celestial body can explain red shift without assuming the body to move. Fatio does not need the Big Bang model. I have advocated a falling ether for many years.
I am very, very, very sorry that no one in CNPS will discuss with me this important question.
With best regards from _________________ John-Erik
-
David
Yes, but we stupid people do not throw away anything until we have found an alternative.
John-Erik
-
Yes, scientists write r^2-c^2*t^2=R^2-c^2*T^2=0. Respecting both equalities gives Galilean transform and no time dilation. Ignoring the last equality gives Lorentz transform with time dilation.
John-Erik
-
The problem is inside us. We must go backwards in our reasoning until we find the first mistake.
John-Erik
-
Jerry
The original mistake was, is I said, that an effect was introduced in the reference arm by Potier. This was based on wrong particle ideas. According to the more relevant wave model we find UNCHANGED orientation of wave fronts in MMX. The same wave front in both arms means no effect of ether wind in reference arm.
All this means that we can avoid time dilation and Lorentz effect and twin paradox. Instead we can use Gallilean transform.
With best regards from _______________ John-Erik
PS
Light is waves and NOT particles. In my article to PHYSICS ESSAYS in June 2021 you can see that ALL phenomena in light can be explained by the wave model. The wave model cal also explain CONTINEOUS radiation from hydrogen. See my profile on RecearchGate.
DS
-
Mark
Your thoughts regarding the relation physics/mathematics are interesting. They are in agreement to my ideas. I think you would be interested in this article.
https://www.gsjournal.net/Science-Journals/Essays/View/8704
Best regards from John-Erik
PS Tell me what y ou think! DS
-
Steven
Newton’s big mistake was that he did not see that his law is valid only for gravity from perfect spheres. For real bodies Newton’s law is only an approximation.
I explained that in my paper.
John-Erik
-
Yes