Member John-Erik
MemberForum Replies Created
-
Marco @ing.mm
2 different theories (models) are not equal, even if they happen to predict the same.
LET (and SRT) are in error by the mistake Michelson did by accepting a ‘half’ effect in the reference arm in MMX. My model is based on no effect in the reference arm.
Regards from ______________ John-Erik
-
Marco
Wave or particle. The great confusion. Light is waves and we are fooled by the ray concept that has no physical existence. The ray is a mathematical concept that can describe a physical wave front that is transverse to the ray.
John-Erik
-
-
Jerry
The eclipse has a small effect on gravity, but this effect converts to a change of the position of matter, since gravity controls position of matter. So, pendulum and near Earth are affected equally and we see no difference.
John-Erik
-
When planets are close in orbiting phase they are attracting each other and when they are in opposite phase the effect is very weak.
John-Erik
-
@ing.mm Marco
I think that the wave model can explain light behaviour. So, light particles are not needed. All we need is ether waves.
Michelson was wrong and he used the particle model instead of the wave model. The wave model states no effect in the reference arm. This means no time dilation a and contraction equal to 2 times the Fitzgerald contraction.
Yes, a vertical ether wind equal to 11.2 km/s is causing gravity. However, this is not an alternative explanation, since motions in vertical and horizontal directions are independent.
Sagnac demonstrated that an ether is possible.
We have already proved that the ether is needed by detecting our planets orbiting motion when we correlated signals from radio telescopes in different positions.
Instead of a wave guiding a particle I prefer to regard a particle generating a wave in the ether; like a boat moving in water.
Hidden variables is not a bad idea in my opinion, but not needed here.
With best regards from ______________ John-Erik
-
Marco
“How could we know for certain that the aether exists?”
– the Lorentz Ether Teory (LET) is mathematically equivalent with Special Relativity (SR),
so, it isn’t possible to discriminate from one and the other with an experiment.
Light and gravity exists, so the ether exists.
LET and SR are both in error. No need to compare.
Most of your questions are answered in “Why Einstein was wrong”, sent to CNPS.
John-Erik
-
Jerry
Here is a link
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/374554272_The_three_great_problems_in_physics
John-Erik
-
Jerry
Michelson-Morley tried to detect the ether wind with a useless method.
I said that ether particles are moving in all directions, and they can be absorbed by matter. But absorption in only one direction means, interaction that can by in both directions.
I have articles on:
CNPS
GSJournal
ResearchGate
AcademiaJohn-Erik
-
Jerry
If the mirror is not moving in relation to the ether there is no reason to a change of light speed.
The ether does not absorb Earth, but Earth absorbs ether.
No, I do not think that ether is concentrated around the Earth. Instead, the ether flow is very slightly reduced in direction away from the Earth. This very, very small effect is gravity – a weak force.
Gravity is a pushing force, but length contraction is not caused by an external force. My view of length contraction is based on an effect in moving forces between atoms in a crystal for controlling their separations. so, two effects in opposite directions are not exact equal, so a second order effect arises. My length contraction is 2 times larger than the FitzGerald contraction.
All these questions are answered much better and more in detail in my papers. So, read my papers first.
John-Erik
-
Jerry
The ether controls the motion of Earth, and therefore the only ether motion we can observe is the motion that is caused by the Earth. That means a radial ether wind of -11.2 km/sec equal to the escape velocity. We know that particles approaching Earth with very low initial speed will hit our planet with that velocity. Since ether particles have mass they also do that, although they are to small for observation. We can also observe the ether wind due planetary rotation, 0.465 km/sec near the Equator. This speed is constant.
We have not measured light speed – but instead two-way light speed.
John-Erik
-
Jerry
In the paper I stated: “The ether is the cause of gravity”.
No, my theory is very, very like Fatio’s. The only difference is that I assume ether particles being absorbed by matter – instead of colliding with matter.
Ether particles are moving in all directions. Therefore the state of motion of the ether is an average value over many particles.
The state of motion of light is well known and equal to c. The problem is: in relation to what? My answer is: in relation to the ether’s state of motion.
The ether tells matter how to move, or a free body approaches the ether’s motion. The Earth does not travel in relation to the ether. The largest ether motion is in radial direction, and this component is generated by Earth (11.2 km/sec). A smaller horizontal ether wind is caused by the rotation of our planet ( 0.465 km/sec at the Equator).
John-Erik
-
Jerry
Gravity seems to be caused by an ether constituted by very fast particles moving in all directions with light speed. However, gravity in itself does not move at all but is emerging in side matter by effects from the ether. Gravity is a very weak force and must be cased by an extremely small difference between the flow in different directions.
A material body in free fall is entrained by the motion of the ether that is a sum of gravity from all celestial bodies. Ether tells matter how to move. Matter also produces a component in the ether. This component is spherically symmetric.
John_Erik
-
Jerry
There is no action at a distance. Ether particles must be very small, since they do not collide with each other. We cannot see their masses and sizes.
I have answers to some of your questions in my last article “The three great problems in physics” on my profile.
John-Erik
-
Jerry
Yes, I think you are essentially right. In my opinion gravity is caused by matter ABSORBING ether particles. Most scientists seem to assume ether particles instead to be COLLIDING with matter. No aberration in gravity supports my opinion. Yes, a very small effect of second order seems to be caused. But this small effect is not observable on Earth, since this effect is controlling how matter moves. So, a part of our planet about the size of the Moon is therefore moved a very small amount away from the Sun/Moon system. Maybe in the order of 1 meter and disturbing the form of our planet. This explains the ‘wobbling’. Interpretation of this effect is best done of the pendulum is at rest. This interpretation is supported by an important observation some years ago when the largest disturbances were found in the beginning and in the end of the eclipse.
It is important to see that gravity DEMANDS the ether.
John-Erik