-
The Aquatic Ape - Presenting the Evidence with Mike Gimbel
Did our ancestors go thru an aquatic lifestyle period of evolution? Find out when David de Hilster interviews Mike Gimbel this Saturday on Dissident Science. -
Disruptive: Rewriting the Rules of Physics with Steven Bryant
Once in a lifetime, we might witness a scientific event so rare and revolutionary that it changes our lives forever. Imagine awakening on the day in history when we learned that the Earth is round, not flat; or awakening on the day we learned that the planets orbit the Sun, not the Earth. Now, imagine awakening tomorrow to learn that Einstein's theory of relativity is wrong!
Demonstrating that Einstein’s theory is wrong is a tall order. Undaunted, author Steven B. Bryant doesn’t simply prove relativity wrong, he shows that relativity theory was never correct in the first place. Unencumbered by relativity, Bryant introduces Modern Mechanics, his new unified theory that is easy to understand and more accurate than Einstein’s theory of relativity. -
Dark Matter: Fantasy or Real? with David de Hilster
David de Hilster will be discussing whether or not Dark Matter is real or a fantasy. Much time and energy are spent by both dissidents and mainstream scientists trying to find this elusive "stuff". But David's question is: does it exist or are we looking for a ghost? Join him live this Saturday! -
Big Problems with the Big Bang with Geroge Coyne
George just released the second edition of this book "Notfinity Process: Matter-in-Motion". And to mark this new edition he will talk about big problems with the Big Bang. For those who conceive of the Universe as having always existed in some form, the continual new estimates of how far back the Big Bang happened are not productive. The Big Bang Theory (BBT) has multiple significant problems, such as horizon, flatness, and monopole, conservation violation, evidence of no expansion, non-Big Bang theory explanations for the CMB, inexplicable mature galaxies in the early universe, 1.65 trillion-year-old structures, and contradictions from HUDF and GALEX data. George will discuss 66 of these issues. In attempting to deal with its problems, supporters shamelessly and frequently change the facts to fit the theory. An important feature in this edition is a discussion on five further serious problems of the BBT, including research released on April 27, 2019, on a revised estimate of the Universe’s age, and a study published on December 14, 2020, regarding a galaxy that was present less than 400 million years after the supposed Big Bang. The significance of this for the BBT is found in Chapter 4. -
Gravity from Aether: WHY? with David de Hilster
David de Hilster has always thought it curious as to why modern day aetherists all try and describe gravity as a result of aether. Why is that? Is it because there is an truly logical answer? Or is it because aetherists are simply overapplying aether to everything because they are so in love with their models? Join David in a stimulating discussion of this modern topic you will find no where else on the internet. -
The Local-Ether Model – A viable alternative to Einstein’s Relativity
A viable alternative to Einstein’s Relativity presented by James Marsen. An overview of a novel ether concept called the Local-Ether Model that was proposed by the late Prof Ching-Chuan Su in 2000.
* It is founded on the classical principles of absolute time and Euclidean Space.
* It is the medium for the classical propagation of electromagnetic waves.
* It is a real substance with a minute variable mass density proportional to the magnitude of the * gravitational potential field.
* Its distribution in space is analogous to the gravitational potential field.
* It provides alternative explanations of a comprehensive scope of fundamental phenomena including those that are commonly cited as evidence supporting Einstein’s Relativity. -
Is Relativity Relevant? - Live Discussion with host David de Hilster
David de Hilster spent over 8 years making the documentary "Einstein Wrong - The Miracle Year" and has a question for everyone: is relativity relevant? Relativity is by far the most disputed theory in physics today. The question is, are we wasting our time beating on a dead subject or do we need to publicly bring down the icon of our age? David discusses this intriguing subject live this Saturday. -
Deriving the Speed of Light - with James Keene
Light speed c along with other so-called "fundamental constants" are measurements ... are observations. As such, they are the greatest body of unexplained phenomena in physics. Why is light speed about 300,000 km/sec, and not, say, 300 km/sec or 30,000,000 km/sec? A comprehensive physical theory cannot use these values as "input parameters", as most physicists have recognized as a game-over fault of the mush promoted Standard Model. James Keene talks about his theory of Binary mechanics is the first physical theory to derive the observed values of light speed and other basic constants (h, e, etc) from mathematically defined first principles. Join host David de Hilster as he explores this amazing topic with his guest Mr. James Keene. -
Modeling the Quantum World with Newtonian Physics - Jeff Yee
We will be talking with Jeff Yee who is currently directing a project to model the universe from the quantum mechanical level on up. From neutrinos and aether, to quarks and neutrons, to protons and electrons. Yee's model correctly generates the SPDF orbitals of electrons around atoms and their isotopes. And anyone can download and play with the model. Don't miss this fascinating presentation and discussion with one of the great critical thinkers of our time! -
How Quantum Mechanics Fails - Threshold Model with Eric Reiter
Eric Reiter, an experimentalist, will be talking about how mainstream's model of quantum mechanics fails and how it is fixed by the "Threshold Model". -
Did Shakespeare base his works on Thomas North? Dennis McCarthy says Yes!
Did Shakespeare Base His Masterpieces on Works by an Obscure Elizabethan Playwright? A new book “North by Shakespeare” examines the link between the Bard of Avon and Sir Thomas North. It is based on the work by Dennis McCarthy. Dennis, a self-taught Shakespeare sleuth’s quest to prove his eye-opening theory about the source of the world’s most famous plays, taking readers inside the vibrant era of Elizabethan England as well as the contemporary scene of Shakespeare scholars and obsessives.
Acclaimed author of The Map Thief, Michael Blanding presents the twinning narratives of renegade scholar Dennis McCarthy, called “the Steve Jobs of the Shakespeare community,” and Sir Thomas North, an Elizabethan courtier whom McCarthy believes to be the undiscovered source for Shakespeare’s plays. For the last fifteen years, McCarthy has obsessively pursued the true origins of Shakespeare’s works. Using plagiarism software, he has found direct links between Hamlet, Macbeth, Romeo and Juliet, and other plays and North’s published and unpublished writings—as well as Shakespearean plotlines seemingly lifted straight from North’s colorful life. -
Expansion Tectonics: BLIND FAITH with Dr. James Maxlow
Maxlow sets out to establish a prima-firma case against established Plate Tectonics by questioning the very essence of plate theory, whereby Earth radius is constrained to a constant radius over time, and to question why this premise still has not been tested using modern geology-based global observational data.
During the 1950s, Emeritus Professor Sam Warren Carey of the University of Tasmania set about assembling the ancient Pangaean Supercontinent on a present-day Earth model in order to quantify Continental Drift theory.
From his research he went on to conclude that: The assembly of Pangaea is not possible on the earth of the present radius.
Unfortunately, with the subsequent acceptance and promotion of Plate Tectonic theory, the very important physical observations and conclusions of Carey continue to be totally ignored to this day, preferring instead to resort to cartoon-based continental reconstructions.
When physical scientific studies present a valid observation it goes without question that this observation should be taken seriously.
Ignoring Carey’s scientific modelling studies in preference to Plate Tectonic theory is therefore a blatant disregard for factual science.
Because of this disregard for factual science Plate Tectonics has now reached the point of cult status, drawn in by blind faith in the hundreds of millions of research dollars spent annually, and it would seem that no amount of factual observation will convince plate tectonists otherwise.
In this vain, Dr. Maxlow will now make an important prediction: The age of Plate Tectonics is drawing to a close and the age of Expansion Tectonics is dawning.