Videos

David de Hilster has always thought it curious as to why modern day aetherists all try and describe gravity as a result of aether. Why is that? Is it because there is an truly logical answer? Or is it because aetherists are simply overapplying aether to everything because they are so in love with their models? Join David in a stimulating discussion of this modern topic you will find no where else on the internet.

A viable alternative to Einstein’s Relativity presented by James Marsen. An overview of a novel ether concept called the Local-Ether Model that was proposed by the late Prof Ching-Chuan Su in 2000.

* It is founded on the classical principles of absolute time and Euclidean Space.
* It is the medium for the classical propagation of electromagnetic waves.
* It is a real substance with a minute variable mass density proportional to the magnitude of the * gravitational potential field.
* Its distribution in space is analogous to the gravitational potential field.
* It provides alternative explanations of a comprehensive scope of fundamental phenomena including those that are commonly cited as evidence supporting Einstein’s Relativity.

David de Hilster spent over 8 years making the documentary "Einstein Wrong - The Miracle Year" and has a question for everyone: is relativity relevant? Relativity is by far the most disputed theory in physics today. The question is, are we wasting our time beating on a dead subject or do we need to publicly bring down the icon of our age? David discusses this intriguing subject live this Saturday.

Light speed c along with other so-called "fundamental constants" are measurements ... are observations. As such, they are the greatest body of unexplained phenomena in physics. Why is light speed about 300,000 km/sec, and not, say, 300 km/sec or 30,000,000 km/sec? A comprehensive physical theory cannot use these values as "input parameters", as most physicists have recognized as a game-over fault of the mush promoted Standard Model. James Keene talks about his theory of Binary mechanics is the first physical theory to derive the observed values of light speed and other basic constants (h, e, etc) from mathematically defined first principles. Join host David de Hilster as he explores this amazing topic with his guest Mr. James Keene.

We will be talking with Jeff Yee who is currently directing a project to model the universe from the quantum mechanical level on up. From neutrinos and aether, to quarks and neutrons, to protons and electrons. Yee's model correctly generates the SPDF orbitals of electrons around atoms and their isotopes. And anyone can download and play with the model. Don't miss this fascinating presentation and discussion with one of the great critical thinkers of our time!

Eric Reiter, an experimentalist, will be talking about how mainstream's model of quantum mechanics fails and how it is fixed by the "Threshold Model".

Did Shakespeare Base His Masterpieces on Works by an Obscure Elizabethan Playwright? A new book “North by Shakespeare” examines the link between the Bard of Avon and Sir Thomas North. It is based on the work by Dennis McCarthy. Dennis, a self-taught Shakespeare sleuth’s quest to prove his eye-opening theory about the source of the world’s most famous plays, taking readers inside the vibrant era of Elizabethan England as well as the contemporary scene of Shakespeare scholars and obsessives.

Acclaimed author of The Map Thief, Michael Blanding presents the twinning narratives of renegade scholar Dennis McCarthy, called “the Steve Jobs of the Shakespeare community,” and Sir Thomas North, an Elizabethan courtier whom McCarthy believes to be the undiscovered source for Shakespeare’s plays. For the last fifteen years, McCarthy has obsessively pursued the true origins of Shakespeare’s works. Using plagiarism software, he has found direct links between Hamlet, Macbeth, Romeo and Juliet, and other plays and North’s published and unpublished writings—as well as Shakespearean plotlines seemingly lifted straight from North’s colorful life.

Maxlow sets out to establish a prima-firma case against established Plate Tectonics by questioning the very essence of plate theory, whereby Earth radius is constrained to a constant radius over time, and to question why this premise still has not been tested using modern geology-based global observational data.

During the 1950s, Emeritus Professor Sam Warren Carey of the University of Tasmania set about assembling the ancient Pangaean Supercontinent on a present-day Earth model in order to quantify Continental Drift theory.

From his research he went on to conclude that: The assembly of Pangaea is not possible on the earth of the present radius.

Unfortunately, with the subsequent acceptance and promotion of Plate Tectonic theory, the very important physical observations and conclusions of Carey continue to be totally ignored to this day, preferring instead to resort to cartoon-based continental reconstructions.

When physical scientific studies present a valid observation it goes without question that this observation should be taken seriously.

Ignoring Carey’s scientific modelling studies in preference to Plate Tectonic theory is therefore a blatant disregard for factual science.

Because of this disregard for factual science Plate Tectonics has now reached the point of cult status, drawn in by blind faith in the hundreds of millions of research dollars spent annually, and it would seem that no amount of factual observation will convince plate tectonists otherwise.

In this vain, Dr. Maxlow will now make an important prediction: The age of Plate Tectonics is drawing to a close and the age of Expansion Tectonics is dawning.

Scalar Theory of Everything - With John Hodge. The Special Theory of Relativity (STOE) applies where gravitation is insignificant. There are many observations that remain poorly explained by the standard models of either the big of cosmology or the small of Quantum mechanics. Each of the STOE axioms has been used in the development of models of observations in the big and the small. The strength of the Scalar Theory Of Everything (STOE) is its ability to describe an extremely wide range of observations and to predict observations.

Host David de Hilster wants you to convince him aether exists. Light needs physicality. Is aether the only solution? Let's talk about it.