Member John-Erik
MemberForum Replies Created
-
The electrons are better on communication that CNPS members
-
ALL
Bohr said that the electron can switch off the radiation when it is in a stable orbit.
I state that there is no switch on the electron. So, radiation is continuous. However, a very well known wave property is destructive superposition. All electrons in a specific state radiate at the same frequency and are also sensitive to that frequency. This communication allows for cooperation and reducing of radiation. Therefore, hydrogen radiation only contains secondary interference frequencies. The primary frequencies are hidden by superposition. We do not understand the wave model. We are filled up with particle ideas.
BOHR WAS WRONG ABOUT WAVES
This is an important question and I am very disappointed to find that no member has been willing to cooperate on this question. David has pointed out the need for more cooperation. However, he has not answered on this thread. Are members too afraid to cooperate? Or do they not have an opinion?
With best regards from _______________ John-Erik
https://www.naturalphilosophy.org/site/johnerikpersson/author/john-erik-perssongmail-com/
-
Bohr was wrong<div>
<div>
Radiation is continuous
The attracting force in radial direction acting on the electron does not travel from the kernel. Instead this force emerges inside the electron as an effect of the ether. We have made important mistakes by using energy conservation without regarding ether energy.
In hydrogen radiation we observe only the differences between the primary frequencies, since the primary frequencies are hidden by destructive superposition. This is possible since all electrons radiate – and are sensitive to radiation – on the same frequency. This is a well known wave property. The idea that radiation can be switched on/off is absurd. We have not understood the wave model. Electrons with switches does not exist.
https://www.gsjournal.net/Science-Journals/Essays/View/7765
From _________ John-Erik
</div></div>
-
Andy
Cosmological constant, as well as Hubble constant, are as much in error as is possible, since they both do not exist.
Big Bang as well as Pioneer anomaly are illusions by the same reasons.
With best regards from ________________ John-Erik
-
Andy
The Hubble constant is also in error
John-Erik
-
Andy
You said: “Infinity is not static”.
I say, that the universe is static at a large scale. (Without the cosmological constant.) Since we can see only very small cosmological blue shifts. The large red shifts are illusions, since we do not understand the wave model. If Newton had listened to Fatio he would observed an important completion needed in his model. Einstein’s gravity is absurd.
With best regards from _____________ John-Erik
-
Andy
.<i style=””>..the universe could not stay static…
Yes it can, but not with Einstein’s gravity. And we do not need the cosmological constant either. We must accept Fatio’s interpretation unitid with Newton’s.
John-Erik
-
Marco
The individual electron radiates. We can only see the sum from many and that sum is almost zero due destructive interference.
John-Erik
-
There is no real point source
-
Do not think too much about infinity
-
Andy
A wave front is a moving surface. How can that be inverted?
There is no real vacuum, since the ether is everywhere. The ether contains a large amount of energy. The feeling in your ass is caused by a very small difference between 2 anti-parallel forces. The ether contains many small and fast particles moving in all directions.
I do not know anything about Higgs.
With best regards from _________________ John-Erik
-
Andy
You said that we cannot detect the ether. I think that you just now are feeling the ether wind’s effect in your ass/bottom. I regard ether as important and has capacity to explain:
- Gravity
- The illusion of Big Bang
- The illusion of Pioneer anomaly
- The illusion of quanta in light and energy – only quanta in ether.
- Compton effect by waves in light.
- Continuous hydrogen radiation – no jumping.
- Black-body radiation with light waves.
If we only can respect the wave model.
The ether has large capacity as I have said in many articles.<div>The are no speed limits in the universe. Einstein suggested a not linear addition of velocities and this predicted infinite mass for a certain speed. This singularity proves that his theory is absurd. Einstein used speed limit to cover up for his error.
With best regards from ______________________ John-Erik
</div>
-
Marco
You seems uncertain regarding electron’s behaviour. But QM is based on the assumption that electrons are assumed to radiate only when they are jumping between two energy states and I regard this idea to be absurd as I said to Andy above.
The fact that we cannot see a continuous motion between the states does not mean that this motion cannot exist. Discreteness in our model does not mean reality of quantum jumping. We have forced a mathematical concept to be real in physics. I have explained to Andy how electrons can radiate continuously by means of a well known wave property. We do not need switches on electrons – and not quantum jumping.
With best regards from ______________________ John-Erik
-
Andy
I most certainly want your opinion on this subject.
Good that we agree on my wave-based explanation on hydrogen radiation. This means that today’s explanation based on electrons – that sometimes radiate and sometimes do not – is wrong. We have refuted QM.
However, I cannot agree to your statement that particles are just wave packets. We do not need quanta in light and in energy. However, I regard them as needed for describing the ether with neutrino-like particles. These etherons also cause gravity – are gravitons too.
With best regards from ______________ John-Erik
-
Andy
See the title of this thread. So, commenting should be around Decontamination of… Instead of analysing my theory you are advocating your theory. That is not OK. What do you think about my theory?
From _______________ John-Erik