Activity Feed Forums New Models Dimension Construction Model

  • Dimension Construction Model

    Posted by Graeme on April 23, 2024 at 2:52 am

    Instead of the space-time continuum being a fabric, backdrop, arena, stage or tabletop for particles to behave and interact accordingly with it’s predefined laws – this model switches that perspective to one where our space-time reality is the result of interactions of the objects themselves. So all physicals laws and effects were the culmination of all the combined interactions of everything in the universe. Thus not requiring any arbitrary values or specific qualities in order to get everything right for life as we know it. Using a natural philosophy this model starts from the basic building block of the zero dimensional “point” particles, and explains how our first, second and third dimensions are naturally constructed, revealing why their relative interactions shape and explain everything from string theory, quantum mechanics through to entropy and gravity.

    • This discussion was modified 1 month ago by  genie. Reason: bad grammar!
    Jerry replied 6 hours, 20 minutes ago 2 Members · 3 Replies
  • 3 Replies
  • Graeme

    April 23, 2024 at 2:55 am

    I’d like to post up some links if that is ok – if not then please let me know – or just delete them and I’ll post the content up here fully.

    Here’s the start of the D Construction model which itself has links to the main concepts and further explanations of how it explains all of physics within its purview.

    What is the D Construction Model? – D Construction Model (

  • Jerry

    May 29, 2024 at 7:05 pm

    Hi Graeme. Interesting thoughts.

    I would personally say that “dimensions” couldn’t exist separately. The original and the only currently accurate definition for dimensions identifies how objects have height, depth, and width. So it is the physical structure of objects that the three dimensions describes. One dimension by itself, such as a line, or two dimensions, such as a plane, isn’t real, or only exists as theoretical. Also, time doesn’t seem to meet the same conceptual qualifications as the three physical dimensions.

    All physical objects seem to exist in open area of empty space, yet the aether, the space-time continuum, and other possible mediums have been theorized to exist, which propagate particles, waves, and even objects. The main phenomena I think aether seems at least somewhat plausible to explain is the “action at a distance” effect. This doesn’t apply only to “entangled particles”, yet also to gravity, electromagnetism, and possibly various other “fields”. However, since the alleged aether is invisible, and impossible to physically detect, it’s composition or structure is impossible to know. Sorry about the tangent. lol

  • Jerry

    May 29, 2024 at 7:18 pm

    Hi again!

    How is it through zero dimensional “point particles” that further dimenions contructed could explain string theory, quantum mechanics, entropy, and gravity? What is a “point particle” exactly? Did you mean something other than observable (or detectable) particles such as, say, protons and electrons? If they’re zero dimensional, how to know they physically exist? If a “point particle” is one miniscule point of something in particular, such as with a dense physical structure, it’s already three dimensional by itself. Or is it possible that point particles consist of somewhat of a “flowing wave or cloud”? If so, what is this composed of? energy? If so, what is “energy” exactly? Is the proton and electron composed of energy? Or is it that they radiate energy? Does energy always involve a “charge”? If so, what is the “pure energy” which is allegedly released when the atom is “split”? Is it possible all energy inevitably boils down to “mechanical energy”? Please let me know your thoughts.