New model needed

  • New model needed

     Ken updated 2 weeks, 4 days ago 4 Members · 7 Posts
  • John

    Member
    July 27, 2021 at 6:08 pm

    There have been many articles and CNPS suggested problems of Relativity. Even if there is a new problem discovered, there are enough identified to compose a new model. I suggest going back to the basic experiments and starting again. This is a paper which was made following my Special Relativity video previously posted in CNPS. Because I had no comments, I wrote it to go on to other thoughts.

    Replacing Special Relativity

    http://www.intellectualarchive.com/getfile.php?file=1lWfpF459fL&orig_file=msesr.pdf

    I would be interested in solving the models rather than regurgitating problems.

    Hodge

  • John-Erik

    Member
    July 28, 2021 at 1:09 pm

    The problem is inside us. We must go backwards in our reasoning until we find the first mistake.

    John-Erik

  • David

    Member
    July 28, 2021 at 3:45 pm

    It’s simple: some theories do not need be replaced. They simply need to be thrown out.

  • John-Erik

    Member
    July 28, 2021 at 5:17 pm

    David

    Yes, but we stupid people do not throw away anything until we have found an alternative.

    John-Erik

  • Ken

    Member
    January 3, 2022 at 11:31 pm

    I completely agree: “There have been many articles and CNPS suggested problems of Relativity. – – I suggest going back to the basic experiments and starting again”. The following link will be a good starting point to review the basics as well as to start again with a model that solves many of the problems of Relativity:

    https://beyondmainstream.org/theory/unified-relativity-model/

  • John

    Member
    January 4, 2022 at 2:38 am

    Ken:

    Agree with the part abou re-examining the experiments that SR used to create the model.

    see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OX9ToS_kgrw&t=51s

    • Ken

      Member
      January 4, 2022 at 5:31 pm

      John.

      Yes, I “Agree with the part about re-examining the experiments that SR used to create the 1905 SR model” Also. I have re-examined his assumptions and have created a 1905 SRT model that clearly describes how Einstein used the MM-Experiment, aberration of starlight, and the Lorentz Factor to determine the geometry from which he derived his stellar aberration equation and reciprocity version that has a Twins Paradox, as well as his longitudinal and transverse length transformations and relativistic frequency shift equations. Also, I have created revised SR models that describe a geometry and dynamics from which new and more reliable stellar aberration equations and a reciprocity version that do not have a Twin Paradox, as well as new longitudinal length transformations and relativistic frequency shift equations that are more reliable.

Viewing 1 - 6 of 6 replies

Log in to reply.

Original Post
0 of 0 posts June 2018
Now