Reply To: Infinity

[Andy]

My writing can be wrought with grammatical flaws and unintentional inconsistencies. For example, I would change the following

From:

In the present, we can absolutely be 100% certain. That’s what happened.

To:

In the present, we can absolutely be 100% certain. That’s what happening now.

So please, read it with a little latitude.

I’m essentially laying down the gauntlet.

This is a mathematical fact:

|0|<∞<|1|

Science’s version is a mathematical assumption:

|0|<|1|<∞

I don’t have to prove anything to anyone. Science has to invalidate accepted mathematical logic to prove their version of mathematical logic is correct. And they cannot use anything but those 3 conditions, which are all unique variables within the problem, because we invented counting. Anything more than 1 is also an assumption.

That’s the gist of what I’m getting at.

[Andy]

My writing can be wrought with grammatical flaws and unintentional inconsistencies. For example, I would change the following

From:

In the present, we can absolutely be 100% certain. That’s what happened.

To:

In the present, we can absolutely be 100% certain. That’s what happening now.

So please, read it with a little latitude.

I’m essentially laying down the gauntlet.

This is a mathematical fact:

|0|<∞<|1|

Science’s version is a mathematical assumption:

|0|<|1|<∞

I don’t have to prove anything to anyone. Science has to invalidate accepted mathematical logic to prove their version of mathematical logic is correct. And they cannot use anything but those 3 conditions, which are all unique variables within the problem, because we invented counting. Anything more than 1 is also an assumption.

That’s the gist of what I’m getting at.