• About WordPress
    • WordPress.org
    • Documentation
    • Support
    • Feedback
  • Log In
  • Register
  • Home
  • Videos
    • Live
    • Zoom Meetings
  • Online Meetings
  • Blogs
    • Beyond Mainstream Science Articles
    • Natural Philosophy Wiki
    • Database
    • Beyond Mainstream Magazine
  • Forums
    • Groups
  • Members
    • Lifetime Award
    • Register
    • Pay Membership / Donate
  • About
    Sign in Sign up
    • Home
    • Videos
      • Live
      • Zoom Meetings
    • Online Meetings
    • Blogs
      • Beyond Mainstream Science Articles
      • Natural Philosophy Wiki
      • Database
      • Beyond Mainstream Magazine
    • Forums
      • Groups
    • Members
      • Lifetime Award
      • Register
      • Pay Membership / Donate
    • About

    According to Cosmogonists Space Needs to Be Continuous, Not Discrete

    According to Cosmogonists Space Needs to Be Continuous, Not Discrete

    That is according to Alan Siegel, author of a disturbing website aptly entitled “Starts with a Bang.” He subtitles his piece with: “We might live…

     31,172 total views,  13 views today

    Glenn December 1, 2020
    4 Comments

    Shopping Cart

    Recent Posts

    • Dr. Glenn Borchardt Receives a Lifetime Achievement Award from the CNPS
    • Nicholas Percival Receives a Lifetime Achievement Award from the CNPS
    • According to Cosmogonists Space Needs to Be Continuous, Not Discrete
    • Extending Newton’s Principia Mathematica
    • Jeff Yee Programming Project

    Recent Comments

    • David on According to Cosmogonists Space Needs to Be Continuous, Not Discrete
    • David on According to Cosmogonists Space Needs to Be Continuous, Not Discrete
    • Kasim on According to Cosmogonists Space Needs to Be Continuous, Not Discrete
    • James on Jeff Yee Programming Project
    • Zack on According to Cosmogonists Space Needs to Be Continuous, Not Discrete

    Archives

    • February 2023
    • December 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • August 2019
    • December 2015

    Categories

    • Ivor Catt
    • Lifetime Award
    • Live
    • New Theories
    • Newton
    • Uncategorized

    Meta

    • Register
    • Log in
    • Entries feed
    • Comments feed
    • WordPress.org
    © 2023 - CNPS

    Forum Description

    That is according to Alan Siegel, author of a disturbing website aptly entitled “Starts with a Bang.” He subtitles his piece with:

    “We might live in a quantum Universe, but we’ll violate the principle of relativity if space is discrete.”

    https://go.glennborchardt.com/space-discrete

    This quote is revealing—sort of like an unconscious admission of guilt. As shown in my recent book “Religious Roots of Relativity,” Einstein’s erroneous assumption that space is perfectly empty is the religious foundation of relativity. All creation theories, including the Big Bang Theory, start with that assumption. Religious folks, including Einstein and his regressive followers, cannot imagine the universe always existed and that there never was, nor ever will be, perfectly empty space. Einstein needed that idealistic ad hoc to assume light particles underwent perpetual motion. Otherwise, they would lose velocity over distance as they collided with other particles in the environment. Without that assumption, the cosmological redshift would have to be considered a simple tired light effect: what happens to everything and every motion traveling from one place to another in the universe. Today’s regressive physicists, of course, must hold fast to Einstein’s ridiculous Untired Light Theory despite their otherwise familiarity with the Second Law of Thermodynamics. That law is what leads to the forthright rejection of claims of perpetual motion that might reach the patent office. The younger Einstein would have thrown out his own claim when he worked at the office in Bern.

    Siegel says:

    “Going to smaller and smaller distance scales reveals more fundamental views of nature, which means if we can understand and describe the smallest scales, we can build our way to an understanding of the largest ones. We do not know whether there is a lower limit to how small ‘chunks of space’ can be.”

    Alan Seigel

    Per infinity, we assume the universe to be infinitely subdividable—there is no limit to how small those “chunks of space” can be. There is no undividable fundamental particle. There can be no “continuous space,” which, by the way, is required for Einstein’s equally ridiculous immaterial field theory. All this is why quantum mechanics and relativity can never be reconciled. The bits of matter recognized by quantum mechanics destroy the perfectly empty space imagined by cosmogonists and regressives alike.

    X