A Simple Classical Interpretation of Fizeau's Experiment - Revision history

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-02T02:20:12Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:20, 1 January 2017
Line 20:		Line 20:
	[[Category:Scientific Paper\|simple classical interpretation fizeau 's experiment]]		[[Category:Scientific Paper\|simple classical interpretation fizeau 's experiment]]

	[[Category:Relativity]]		[[Category:Relativity\|simple classical interpretation fizeau 's experiment]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-01T17:03:12Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:03, 1 January 2017
Line 16:		Line 16:
	==Abstract==		==Abstract==

	It is well known that Stokes's aether dragged theory is one of the best classical aether theories, since it is in agreement with almost all experimental results (see for instance R. Resnick's popular textbook: Introduction to Special Relativity). This theory is usually dismissed on the grounds of two natural phenomena, which are said to be "unexplainable" in Stokes's conceptual context: Bradley's astronomical annual aberration, and the speed of light in moving water (Fizeau's experiment). In this paper, a simple "time-delay" model for the behaviour of light in a transparent medium is given, which at least gets rid of the second of the two previous objections.[[Category:Scientific Paper]]		It is well known that Stokes's aether dragged theory is one of the best classical aether theories, since it is in agreement with almost all experimental results (see for instance R. Resnick's popular textbook: Introduction to Special Relativity). This theory is usually dismissed on the grounds of two natural phenomena, which are said to be "unexplainable" in Stokes's conceptual context: Bradley's astronomical annual aberration, and the speed of light in moving water (Fizeau's experiment). In this paper, a simple "time-delay" model for the behaviour of light in a transparent medium is given, which at least gets rid of the second of the two previous objections.

			[[Category:Scientific Paper\|simple classical interpretation fizeau 's experiment]]

	[[Category:Relativity]]		[[Category:Relativity]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2016-12-30T05:08:30Z

Imported from text file

New page

{{Infobox paper
| title = A Simple Classical Interpretation of Fizeau\'s Experiment
| url = [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_645.pdf Link to paper]
| author = [[Umberto Bartocci]], [[Giuseppe Antoni]]
| keywords = [[Special Relativity]], [[Stokes's Aether Theory]], [[Speed]]
| published = 2001
| journal = [[Apeiron]]
| volume = [[8]]
| number = [[3]]
| num_pages = 7
| pages = 139-145
}}

'''Read the full paper''' [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_645.pdf here]

==Abstract==

It is well known that Stokes's aether dragged theory is one of the best classical aether theories, since it is in agreement with almost all experimental results (see for instance R. Resnick's popular textbook: Introduction to Special Relativity). This theory is usually dismissed on the grounds of two natural phenomena, which are said to be "unexplainable" in Stokes's conceptual context: Bradley's astronomical annual aberration, and the speed of light in moving water (Fizeau's experiment). In this paper, a simple "time-delay" model for the behaviour of light in a transparent medium is given, which at least gets rid of the second of the two previous objections.[[Category:Scientific Paper]]

[[Category:Relativity]]