A Counter Example of Einstein's Covariance Principle - Revision history

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-02T02:14:57Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:14, 1 January 2017
Line 16:		Line 16:
	[[Category:Scientific Paper\|counter example einstein 's covariance principle]]		[[Category:Scientific Paper\|counter example einstein 's covariance principle]]

	[[Category:Relativity]]		[[Category:Relativity\|counter example einstein 's covariance principle]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-01T16:54:12Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:54, 1 January 2017
Line 12:		Line 12:
	==Abstract==		==Abstract==

	Recently, calculation of the deflection angle to the second order also shows gauge invariance in mathematics. Nevertheless, careful analysis shows that this calculation actually implies that the theory is intrinsically not gauge invariant since, for each gauge, the shortest distance r<sub>0</sub> from the sun center is different from that for another gauge. Some argued that r<sub>0</sub> is just a label, but not a physical quantity. This is directly in conflict with Einstein's calculation that the deflection angle is 4KM/r<sub>0</sub>, where M is the total mass of the sun and K = G/c<sup>2</sup> = 7.425x10<sup>-29</sup> cm/g. Thus, r<sub>0</sub> is not just a label. Hence, Einstein's covariance principle is intrinsically not valid in physics. Thus, logical maturity is currently a major problem in general relativity.[[Category:Scientific Paper]]		Recently, calculation of the deflection angle to the second order also shows gauge invariance in mathematics. Nevertheless, careful analysis shows that this calculation actually implies that the theory is intrinsically not gauge invariant since, for each gauge, the shortest distance r<sub>0</sub> from the sun center is different from that for another gauge. Some argued that r<sub>0</sub> is just a label, but not a physical quantity. This is directly in conflict with Einstein's calculation that the deflection angle is 4KM/r<sub>0</sub>, where M is the total mass of the sun and K = G/c<sup>2</sup> = 7.425x10<sup>-29</sup> cm/g. Thus, r<sub>0</sub> is not just a label. Hence, Einstein's covariance principle is intrinsically not valid in physics. Thus, logical maturity is currently a major problem in general relativity.

			[[Category:Scientific Paper\|counter example einstein 's covariance principle]]

	[[Category:Relativity]]		[[Category:Relativity]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2016-12-30T17:21:01Z

Imported from text file

New page

{{Infobox paper
| title = A Counter Example of Einstein\'s Covariance Principle
| url = [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_2368.pdf Link to paper]
| author = [[Chung Y Lo]]
| published = 2009
| journal = [[None]]
| num_pages = 11
}}

'''Read the full paper''' [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_2368.pdf here]

==Abstract==

Recently, calculation of the deflection angle to the second order also shows gauge invariance in mathematics. Nevertheless, careful analysis shows that this calculation actually implies that the theory is intrinsically not gauge invariant since, for each gauge, the shortest distance r0 from the sun center is different from that for another gauge. Some argued that r0 is just a label, but not a physical quantity. This is directly in conflict with Einstein's calculation that the deflection angle is 4KM/r0, where M is the total mass of the sun and K = G/c2 = 7.425x10-29 cm/g. Thus, r0 is not just a label. Hence, Einstein's covariance principle is intrinsically not valid in physics. Thus, logical maturity is currently a major problem in general relativity.[[Category:Scientific Paper]]

[[Category:Relativity]]