Director David
DirectorForum Replies Created
-
Jerry: we follow Borchardt’s philosophy of infinity and therefore no two particles in the universe are identical. As for an analogy to the solar system, our G1 particle size variation is really not known. It must have a range of sizes. Same for the G2 particle.
-
We have the Mathjax-Latex plugin installed which allows for math equations. Here is a link on how you can use it: https://wordpress.org/plugins/mathjax-latex/
-
I think you should read the books on infinity by Peter Erickson. He addresses this same concept quite nicely. https://www.amazon.com/Nature-Infinitesimals-Peter-F-Erickson/dp/1479701823
-
It’s simple: some theories do not need be replaced. They simply need to be thrown out.
-
Again, we are not looking for people to review the book. We are looking for those interested in the theory and who would like to help us make the words, concepts, and graphics clearer for the reader. If you are interested in pre-reading the book and giving helpful feedback and have not yet received an email with instructions on how to do so, please let me know here. Thanks!
-
We are now sending out emails to all of you who have volunteered to pre-read our book before publishing. Look for two emails in the coming week: one for a link to the PDF file of our book, and one email for instructions for what we are looking for. You will receive a signed copy of the book for your efforts. My father and I greatly appreciate your help!
-
-
I am taking off March 15-19 to finish the book with my father. On Sunday, we should be sending out a PDF file for those who are wanting us to make the book more clear.
-
We are still working on our book. We have some graphics to redo and also are finishing up the section on the Double Slit Experiment.
-
Ken, you have to read Dowdye for yourself. I’m not truly interested in this because I’m not interested in math even though I’m a mathematician. I’m interested in a physical explanation for gravity and everything. Until then, we are working with math and arguing about GR being right or wrong but all the arguments do not matter until we give physicality to gravity, light, magnetism and electricity.
-
You had asked specifically about Einstein Rings. I gave you a video of that. Dr. Dowdye who unfortunately died a year back, has a website explaining his ideas. The simple fact that gravity does not bend light outside of a corona is evidence against GR: http://www.extinctionshift.com
-
One name who presented countless times at the NPA and even CNPS: Dr. Edward Dowdye. Here is a video about Einstein Rings and Dowdye’s work: https://youtu.be/iLavU8xjDsc
-
Ken: special relativity and general relativity are wrong. Ask Dr. Cynthia Whitney who got her PHD in special relativity from MIT and when she applied it to ring gyroscopes, it failed. It also fails in particle accelerators where mass increase is not observed. General relativity predicts gravity bends light yet outside the corona of suns, it should bend but does not. Relativity is wrong so it is not necessary to reproduce a failed theory. Also, there is no physicality ever given to mass increase or spacetime.
Finally, you and I or any of us are not the judges of new theory or models. History will be the judge of that.
-
John:
People are willing to discuss. But you are here to “tell” us your truth. That is fine. But discussion or comments must show wiliness on both sides to change their minds.
You know all truth already. So discussion is not needed.
-
Scott, we are happy to have you volunteer. We will be sending out the book in pdf format with specific instructions of what we are looking for.
