Jump to content

Criteria for the Study of Natural Philosophy

From Natural Philosophy Wiki
Revision as of 21:20, 29 December 2016 by Maintenance script (talk | contribs) (Imported from text file)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Scientific Paper
TitleCriteria for the Study of Natural Philosophy
Author(s)Domina Eberle Spencer
Keywords{{{keywords}}}
Published2007
JournalProceedings of the NPA
Volume4
Number2
Pages242-244

Abstract

The study of any branch of Natural Philosophy should be based on:

  1. A clear statement of the physical postulates on which the branch of natural philosophy to be studied is based
  2. A careful study of the optimum mathematical representation of each physical concept to be employed.

What type of holor most perfectly describes each physical concept employed? Is each concept best represented by: a scalar, a complex number, a vector, a matrix, a tensor, or a new type of holor?