Jump to content

A Threefold Cord: Philosophy, Science, Religion: a Discussion Between Vicount Samuel and Professor Herbert Dingle: Difference between revisions

From Natural Philosophy Wiki
Imported from text file
 
Imported from text file
 
Line 15: Line 15:
==Links to Purchase Book==
==Links to Purchase Book==


* [[http://www.amazon.com/Threefold-Cord-Hernert-Dingle/dp/B000ZN9TC2/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1219075391&sr=1-2 A Threefold Cord: Philosophy, Science, Religion: a Discussion Between Vicount Samuel and Professor Herbert Dingle]][[Category:Book]]
* [[http://www.amazon.com/Threefold-Cord-Hernert-Dingle/dp/B000ZN9TC2/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1219075391&sr=1-2 A Threefold Cord: Philosophy, Science, Religion: a Discussion Between Vicount Samuel and Professor Herbert Dingle]][[Category:Book|threefold cord philosophy science religion discussion between vicount samuel professor herbert dingle]]


[[Category:Relativity]]
[[Category:Relativity|threefold cord philosophy science religion discussion between vicount samuel professor herbert dingle]]

Latest revision as of 08:32, 2 January 2017

A Threefold Cord: Philosophy, Science, Religion: a Discussion Between Vicount Samuel and Professor Herbert Dingle
Error creating thumbnail: File missing
AuthorHerbert Dingle
Published1961
PublisherGeorge Allen and Unwin
Pages280
ISBNB000FSRQQI Invalid ISBN

This book originated in the belief that there is an urgent need at the present time for a greater association between philosophers and scientists and of both with religious people. The problem of bringing this association into being is approached from different angles by the two authors, who, while agreeing on the main thesis, differ on many details, and the discussion is largely concerned with an examination of the points of difference. It ranges over the significance of scientific concepts, such as ether, energy, space and time, the place of mathematics in science and of linguistics in philosophy, the nature of scientific thought in relation to the universe as a whole, problems of life, mind, ethics and theology. It also raises questions of importance concerning the present attitudes of organizations dealing with these matters towards their respective concerns.

In the course of the discussion, Dingle described how a scientific paper critical of special relativity was rejected by various journals. Part of the paper is reproduced as Appendix II of the book, and is a very clear description of his "Proof that Einstein?s Special Theory cannot correspond with fact."

Links to Purchase Book