Jump to content

Three Arguments on the Nature of Space: Difference between revisions

From Natural Philosophy Wiki
Imported from text file
 
Imported from text file
Line 2: Line 2:
| title = Three Arguments on the Nature of Space
| title = Three Arguments on the Nature of Space
| author = [[John B Kizer]]
| author = [[John B Kizer]]
| published = 1977
| keywords = [[nature]], [[space]], [[geometry]], [[general relativity]], [[Maxwell's equations]], [[Lesagian particles]], [[waves]]
| published = 1983
| journal = [[None]]
| journal = [[None]]
| pages = 39-43
| pages = 39-43
Line 9: Line 10:
==Abstract==
==Abstract==


1977, 1st Place[[Category:Scientific Paper]]
The best and simplest models of reality are visualizable models as opposed to formal models. It is proved that non-Euclidean geometry only exists as a special case of a higher dimensional Euclidean geometry, thereby negating general relativity.
 
The infalling saves of Maxwell's equations, a perennial problem for electrodynamics theorists, can be explained as Lesagian particles (or waves).
 
A consistent theory of the Lorentz transformation is developed, including a new explanation of the Airy experiment.
 
[[Category:Scientific Paper|arguments nature space]]
 
[[Category:Gravity]]

Revision as of 13:31, 1 January 2017

Scientific Paper
TitleThree Arguments on the Nature of Space
Author(s)John B Kizer
Keywordsnature, space, geometry, general relativity, Maxwell's equations, Lesagian particles, waves
Published1983
JournalNone
Pages39-43

Abstract

The best and simplest models of reality are visualizable models as opposed to formal models. It is proved that non-Euclidean geometry only exists as a special case of a higher dimensional Euclidean geometry, thereby negating general relativity.

The infalling saves of Maxwell's equations, a perennial problem for electrodynamics theorists, can be explained as Lesagian particles (or waves).

A consistent theory of the Lorentz transformation is developed, including a new explanation of the Airy experiment.