On a Relativistic Magnetic Top: Difference between revisions
Imported from text file |
Imported from text file |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
The development of theories of elementary particles as extended objects, from Thomson to Dehmelt and MacGregor, is reviewed. Most of the theories are inspired by the existence of particle spin. The arguments of their authors are contrasted to Pauli's assertion than spin is "a classically non-explainable two-valuedness," as well as to Dirac's theory of a point electron.[[Category:Scientific Paper]] | The development of theories of elementary particles as extended objects, from Thomson to Dehmelt and MacGregor, is reviewed. Most of the theories are inspired by the existence of particle spin. The arguments of their authors are contrasted to Pauli's assertion than spin is "a classically non-explainable two-valuedness," as well as to Dirac's theory of a point electron. | ||
[[Category:Scientific Paper|relativistic magnetic]] | |||
[[Category:Relativity]] | [[Category:Relativity]] | ||
Revision as of 12:47, 1 January 2017
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | On a Relativistic Magnetic Top |
| Author(s) | Mirjana Bozic, Dusan Arsenovic |
| Keywords | relativistic magnetic top, particle spin, point electron |
| Published | 1997 |
| Journal | None |
| Pages | 201-207 |
Abstract
The development of theories of elementary particles as extended objects, from Thomson to Dehmelt and MacGregor, is reviewed. Most of the theories are inspired by the existence of particle spin. The arguments of their authors are contrasted to Pauli's assertion than spin is "a classically non-explainable two-valuedness," as well as to Dirac's theory of a point electron.