Nightmares of the Art of Measuring: Difference between revisions
Imported from text file |
Imported from text file |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
There are two classes of errors encountered in investigating claims of anomalous energy. One deals with experimental errors, such as misreading and misusing instrumentation or improper handling of uncertainties and errors. The other deals particularly with mistakes made in testing thrust forces. A partial list of the former was published in ESJ 36. What follows is among the first attempts at the latter.[[Category:Scientific Paper]] | There are two classes of errors encountered in investigating claims of anomalous energy. One deals with experimental errors, such as misreading and misusing instrumentation or improper handling of uncertainties and errors. The other deals particularly with mistakes made in testing thrust forces. A partial list of the former was published in ESJ 36. What follows is among the first attempts at the latter. | ||
[[Category:Scientific Paper|nightmares art measuring]] | |||
Latest revision as of 12:45, 1 January 2017
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Nightmares of the Art of Measuring |
| Read in full | Link to paper |
| Author(s) | George D Hathaway |
| Keywords | error analysis, experimental technique, instrumentation, overunity, troubleshooting |
| Published | 2007 |
| Journal | Electric Spacecraft Journal |
| Number | 42 |
| No. of pages | 6 |
| Pages | 22-25 |
Read the full paper here
Abstract
There are two classes of errors encountered in investigating claims of anomalous energy. One deals with experimental errors, such as misreading and misusing instrumentation or improper handling of uncertainties and errors. The other deals particularly with mistakes made in testing thrust forces. A partial list of the former was published in ESJ 36. What follows is among the first attempts at the latter.