Mass Rotation Controls Orbiting: Difference between revisions
Imported from text file |
Imported from text file |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
<span style="font-family: Book Antiqua; font-size: x-small;">Prior to the development of physics as a science it was sufficient to have motion that offsets a perpendicular gravitational force and continues forever.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>The total absence of any friction could be assigned to the ‘void’ of space.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>But perpetual motion and empty space are now seen as fallacies.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Continuous motion needs a driving force for impetus.</span> | <span style="font-family: Book Antiqua; font-size: x-small;">Prior to the development of physics as a science it was sufficient to have motion that offsets a perpendicular gravitational force and continues forever.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>The total absence of any friction could be assigned to the ‘void’ of space.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>But perpetual motion and empty space are now seen as fallacies.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Continuous motion needs a driving force for impetus.</span> | ||
[[Category:Scientific Paper]] | [[Category:Scientific Paper|]] | ||
[[Category:Gravity]] | [[Category:Gravity]] | ||
Latest revision as of 12:40, 1 January 2017
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Mass Rotation Controls Orbiting |
| Read in full | Link to paper |
| Author(s) | Paul Schroeder |
| Keywords | {{{keywords}}} |
| Published | 2013 |
| Journal | None |
Read the full paper here
Abstract
Prior to the development of physics as a science it was sufficient to have motion that offsets a perpendicular gravitational force and continues forever. The total absence of any friction could be assigned to the ‘void’ of space. But perpetual motion and empty space are now seen as fallacies. Continuous motion needs a driving force for impetus.
[[Category:Scientific Paper|]]