Galilean Interpretation of the Hubble Constant: Difference between revisions
Imported from text file |
Imported from text file |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
In December of 1998, there was published a seminal work using precise measurements of supernovae magnitudes and leading to the conclusion of an apparent accelerated expansion of the observed part of the Universe. But when we approach the processing of these precise data from a classical ethereal position, without relativistic<span style="COLOR: #ff0000"> </span>adjustments, we get another picture, and we believe it is the correct one. It is presented in this paper. | In December of 1998, there was published a seminal work using precise measurements of supernovae magnitudes and leading to the conclusion of an apparent accelerated expansion of the observed part of the Universe. But when we approach the processing of these precise data from a classical ethereal position, without relativistic<span style="COLOR: #ff0000"> </span>adjustments, we get another picture, and we believe it is the correct one. It is presented in this paper. | ||
'' <p>Dedicated to the bright memory of my daughter Anastasia. August 1, 2003</p>''[[Category:Scientific Paper]] | '' <p>Dedicated to the bright memory of my daughter Anastasia. August 1, 2003</p>'' | ||
[[Category:Scientific Paper|galilean interpretation hubble constant]] | |||
[[Category:Relativity]] | [[Category:Relativity]] | ||
Revision as of 12:27, 1 January 2017
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Galilean Interpretation of the Hubble Constant |
| Author(s) | Karim Amen Khaidarov |
| Keywords | {{{keywords}}} |
| Published | 2005 |
| Journal | Galilean Electrodynamics |
| Volume | 16 |
| Number | 6 |
| Pages | 103-105 |
Abstract
In December of 1998, there was published a seminal work using precise measurements of supernovae magnitudes and leading to the conclusion of an apparent accelerated expansion of the observed part of the Universe. But when we approach the processing of these precise data from a classical ethereal position, without relativistic adjustments, we get another picture, and we believe it is the correct one. It is presented in this paper.
Dedicated to the bright memory of my daughter Anastasia. August 1, 2003