Demystifying the EPR Paradox: Difference between revisions
Imported from text file |
Imported from text file |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
Bell?s Theorem has been established by considering de Broglie?s postulate. Therefore, if the duality of the wave-particle should be considered a property of the helical trajectory, as proposed by Natarajan(1), then we would have to consider the results of Aspect?s experiment from a new viewpoint. The present paper analyses Aspect?s experiment by considering the model proposed by the author in the paper A Model of the Photon. | Bell?s Theorem has been established by considering de Broglie?s postulate. Therefore, if the duality of the wave-particle should be considered a property of the helical trajectory, as proposed by Natarajan(1), then we would have to consider the results of Aspect?s experiment from a new viewpoint. The present paper analyses Aspect?s experiment by considering the model proposed by the author in the paper A Model of the Photon. | ||
[[Category:Scientific Paper]] | [[Category:Scientific Paper|demystifying epr paradox]] | ||
Latest revision as of 12:14, 1 January 2017
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Demystifying the EPR Paradox |
| Author(s) | Wladimir Guglinski |
| Keywords | {{{keywords}}} |
| Journal | None |
| Pages | 26-31 |
Abstract
In 1982, Alain Aspect conducted an experiment in order to examine Bell?s Theorem. His experiment is considered to confirm the non-local action principle. As is known, the local action principle is an Aristotlean concept, and even Einstein never completely rejected it.
Bell?s Theorem has been established by considering de Broglie?s postulate. Therefore, if the duality of the wave-particle should be considered a property of the helical trajectory, as proposed by Natarajan(1), then we would have to consider the results of Aspect?s experiment from a new viewpoint. The present paper analyses Aspect?s experiment by considering the model proposed by the author in the paper A Model of the Photon.