China Mathematical Scandal: Difference between revisions
Imported from text file |
Imported from text file |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
I do not have the sufficient mathematical knowledge to judge major mathematical problems, i.e. Fermat's Last Theorem (FLT), Riemann's Hypothesis (RH), Jiang Chun-xuan's proof of FLT, Wiles's in question proof of FLT, or Jiang Chun-xuan's disproof RH, etc. Accordingly, in my writings involving Jiang Chun-xuan and his mathematical achievements, I have been very careful only to quote comments by others on Jiang's work, including positive appraising remarks, and negative discrediting remarks, and raising questions about such conflicting remarks about Jiang and his work, and not stating any mathematical judgments of Jiang's work.[[Category:Scientific Paper]] | I do not have the sufficient mathematical knowledge to judge major mathematical problems, i.e. Fermat's Last Theorem (FLT), Riemann's Hypothesis (RH), Jiang Chun-xuan's proof of FLT, Wiles's in question proof of FLT, or Jiang Chun-xuan's disproof RH, etc. Accordingly, in my writings involving Jiang Chun-xuan and his mathematical achievements, I have been very careful only to quote comments by others on Jiang's work, including positive appraising remarks, and negative discrediting remarks, and raising questions about such conflicting remarks about Jiang and his work, and not stating any mathematical judgments of Jiang's work. | ||
[[Category:Scientific Paper|china mathematical scandal]] | |||
Latest revision as of 12:08, 1 January 2017
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | China Mathematical Scandal |
| Author(s) | Chun-Xuan Jiang |
| Keywords | Mathematics |
| Published | 2009 |
| Journal | General Science Journal |
| No. of pages | 9 |
Abstract
I do not have the sufficient mathematical knowledge to judge major mathematical problems, i.e. Fermat's Last Theorem (FLT), Riemann's Hypothesis (RH), Jiang Chun-xuan's proof of FLT, Wiles's in question proof of FLT, or Jiang Chun-xuan's disproof RH, etc. Accordingly, in my writings involving Jiang Chun-xuan and his mathematical achievements, I have been very careful only to quote comments by others on Jiang's work, including positive appraising remarks, and negative discrediting remarks, and raising questions about such conflicting remarks about Jiang and his work, and not stating any mathematical judgments of Jiang's work.