Analyzing Basic Physics: Difference between revisions
Imported from text file |
Imported from text file |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| title = Analyzing Basic Physics | | title = Analyzing Basic Physics | ||
| url = [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_757.pdf Link to paper] | | url = [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_757.pdf Link to paper] | ||
| author = [[Robert A | | author = [[Robert A Kerr]] | ||
| published = 2002 | | published = 2002 | ||
| journal = [[Reality & Meaning Journal]] | | journal = [[Reality & Meaning Journal]] | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
Analysis is the process of determining the reason for events. Its product is conceptual reality. The process is philosophy. Stephen Hawking (himself no philosopher) stated: "Philosophers can no longer understand science." The converse of his statement also appears to be evident: Scientists can no longer understand philosophy. Although both of these statements are generally true, I'm sure that some exceptions do occur. The following is an attempt to repair the apparent breach between science and philosophy. | Analysis is the process of determining the reason for events. Its product is conceptual reality. The process is philosophy. Stephen Hawking (himself no philosopher) stated: "Philosophers can no longer understand science." The converse of his statement also appears to be evident: Scientists can no longer understand philosophy. Although both of these statements are generally true, I'm sure that some exceptions do occur. The following is an attempt to repair the apparent breach between science and philosophy. | ||
[[Category:Scientific Paper]] | [[Category:Scientific Paper|analyzing basic physics]] | ||
Latest revision as of 11:57, 1 January 2017
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Analyzing Basic Physics |
| Read in full | Link to paper |
| Author(s) | Robert A Kerr |
| Keywords | {{{keywords}}} |
| Published | 2002 |
| Journal | Reality & Meaning Journal |
| Volume | 11 |
| Number | 49 |
| No. of pages | 2 |
Read the full paper here
Abstract
Analysis is the process of determining the reason for events. Its product is conceptual reality. The process is philosophy. Stephen Hawking (himself no philosopher) stated: "Philosophers can no longer understand science." The converse of his statement also appears to be evident: Scientists can no longer understand philosophy. Although both of these statements are generally true, I'm sure that some exceptions do occur. The following is an attempt to repair the apparent breach between science and philosophy.