Jump to content

Ajay Sharma Rejustifies His Paper on the Generalization of E = mc2, Pointing Out Elementary Mistake's in Andrew George's Paper: Difference between revisions

From Natural Philosophy Wiki
Imported from text file
 
Imported from text file
 
Line 15: Line 15:
==Abstract==
==Abstract==


To draw scientific Conclusions, the knowledge of the paper/topic and basic aspects of science is necessary.  But it has not been so in Prof. Andrew George's comments regarding Ajay Sharma's work on Einstein's Sep. 1905 paper.  Ajay Sharma has confirmed in various publications that Einstein's Sep. 1905 paper contradicts laws of conservation of matter under some conditions.  This aspect is justified here.[[Category:Scientific Paper]]
To draw scientific Conclusions, the knowledge of the paper/topic and basic aspects of science is necessary.  But it has not been so in Prof. Andrew George's comments regarding Ajay Sharma's work on Einstein's Sep. 1905 paper.  Ajay Sharma has confirmed in various publications that Einstein's Sep. 1905 paper contradicts laws of conservation of matter under some conditions.  This aspect is justified here.
 
[[Category:Scientific Paper|ajay sharma rejustifies paper generalization e mc pointing elementary mistake 's andrew george 's paper]]

Latest revision as of 12:55, 1 January 2017

Scientific Paper
TitleAjay Sharma Rejustifies His Paper on the Generalization of E = mc2, Pointing Out Elementary Mistake\'s in Andrew George\'s Paper
Read in fullLink to paper
Author(s)Ajay Sharma
Keywords{{{keywords}}}
Published2008
JournalOld and New Concepts of Physics
Volume5
Number3
No. of pages6
Pages553-558

Read the full paper here

Abstract

To draw scientific Conclusions, the knowledge of the paper/topic and basic aspects of science is necessary.  But it has not been so in Prof. Andrew George's comments regarding Ajay Sharma's work on Einstein's Sep. 1905 paper.  Ajay Sharma has confirmed in various publications that Einstein's Sep. 1905 paper contradicts laws of conservation of matter under some conditions.  This aspect is justified here.