Illusions and Reality in Relativity: Difference between revisions
Imported from text file |
Imported from text file |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
The interpretations of phenomena behind the theory of relativity are discussed and analyzed. Theories different from those founding the theory of relativity are presented. It is demonstrated that classical concepts can explain most observations. It is therefore concluded that the exotic and absurd theory of relativity is not necessary. Instead of Einstein's theory we need to include the concept of ether.[[Category:Scientific Paper]] | The interpretations of phenomena behind the theory of relativity are discussed and analyzed. Theories different from those founding the theory of relativity are presented. It is demonstrated that classical concepts can explain most observations. It is therefore concluded that the exotic and absurd theory of relativity is not necessary. Instead of Einstein's theory we need to include the concept of ether. | ||
[[Category:Scientific Paper|illusions reality relativity]] | |||
[[Category:Aether]] | [[Category:Aether]] | ||
[[Category:Relativity]] | [[Category:Relativity]] | ||
Revision as of 12:32, 1 January 2017
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Illusions and Reality in Relativity |
| Read in full | Link to paper |
| Author(s) | John-Erik Persson |
| Keywords | Ether, relativity, Sagnac effect, stellar aberration |
| Published | 2011 |
| Journal | Proceedings of the NPA |
| Volume | 8 |
| No. of pages | 4 |
| Pages | 445-449 |
Read the full paper here
Abstract
The interpretations of phenomena behind the theory of relativity are discussed and analyzed. Theories different from those founding the theory of relativity are presented. It is demonstrated that classical concepts can explain most observations. It is therefore concluded that the exotic and absurd theory of relativity is not necessary. Instead of Einstein's theory we need to include the concept of ether.