Jump to content

Thoughts from Bill Whamond: Difference between revisions

From Natural Philosophy Wiki
Imported from text file
 
Imported from text file
Line 17: Line 17:
The content of Whamond?s letters far exceeds the scope of this article. In more recent letters, he has discussed his theories, conceptual as well as rigorously mathematical, about the relationships between spheres (e.g., earth) and pyramids. We hope to be passing along more of his ideas in subsequent issues. We also hope that the translation from letter to print has not caused a distortion of his ideas.
The content of Whamond?s letters far exceeds the scope of this article. In more recent letters, he has discussed his theories, conceptual as well as rigorously mathematical, about the relationships between spheres (e.g., earth) and pyramids. We hope to be passing along more of his ideas in subsequent issues. We also hope that the translation from letter to print has not caused a distortion of his ideas.


[[Category:Scientific Paper]]
[[Category:Scientific Paper|thoughts whamond]]


[[Category:Gravity]]
[[Category:Gravity]]

Revision as of 13:31, 1 January 2017

Scientific Paper
TitleThoughts from Bill Whamond
Author(s)Bill Whamond
Keywordsalternative theory, contrarian viewpoints, critiques
Published1994
JournalElectric Spacecraft Journal
Number12
Pages29-33

Abstract

Bill Whamond has contributed to previous issues of ESJ. His ideas on the magnetic monopole appeared in ESJ 9. The Roos article he submitted, which showed how to convert magnetic field intensity into pressure force, appeared in ESJ 10.

In the following article, he emphasizes similarities between electric, magnetic and gravitational force equations; and expresses some of his thoughts about the Searl levity disk design.

The content of Whamond?s letters far exceeds the scope of this article. In more recent letters, he has discussed his theories, conceptual as well as rigorously mathematical, about the relationships between spheres (e.g., earth) and pyramids. We hope to be passing along more of his ideas in subsequent issues. We also hope that the translation from letter to print has not caused a distortion of his ideas.