Moving Clock Does not Run Slow: Difference between revisions
Imported from text file |
Imported from text file |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
This note is not intended to show that the time dilation formula in special relativity is wrong. Instead, I will show that the formula has been misinterpreted. In particular, I will show that the time dilation formula does not imply a moving clock runs slower compared to a stationary clock. As a corollary, there is no twin paradox.[[Category:Scientific Paper]] | This note is not intended to show that the time dilation formula in special relativity is wrong. Instead, I will show that the formula has been misinterpreted. In particular, I will show that the time dilation formula does not imply a moving clock runs slower compared to a stationary clock. As a corollary, there is no twin paradox. | ||
[[Category:Scientific Paper|moving clock does run slow]] | |||
[[Category:Relativity]] | [[Category:Relativity]] | ||
Revision as of 12:43, 1 January 2017
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Moving Clock Does not Run Slow |
| Read in full | Link to paper |
| Author(s) | Boon Leong Lan |
| Keywords | special relativity, clocks, time |
| Published | 2009 |
| Journal | None |
| No. of pages | 3 |
Read the full paper here
Abstract
This note is not intended to show that the time dilation formula in special relativity is wrong. Instead, I will show that the formula has been misinterpreted. In particular, I will show that the time dilation formula does not imply a moving clock runs slower compared to a stationary clock. As a corollary, there is no twin paradox.