Hafele and Keating Tests; Did They Prove Anything?: Difference between revisions
Imported from text file |
Imported from text file |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
The original test results were not published by Hafele & Keating, in their famous 1972 paper; they published figures that were radically different from the actual test results which are here published for the first time. An analysis of the real data shows that no credence can be given to the conclusions of Hafele & Keating.[[Category:Scientific Paper]] | The original test results were not published by Hafele & Keating, in their famous 1972 paper; they published figures that were radically different from the actual test results which are here published for the first time. An analysis of the real data shows that no credence can be given to the conclusions of Hafele & Keating. | ||
[[Category:Scientific Paper|hafele keating tests did prove]] | |||
[[Category:Relativity]] | [[Category:Relativity]] | ||
Revision as of 13:30, 1 January 2017
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Hafele and Keating Tests; Did They Prove Anything? |
| Author(s) | Alphonsus G Kelly |
| Keywords | Hafele-Keating Experiment, Cesium Clocks, Relativity, Clock Accuracy, Drift Rate |
| Published | 2000 |
| Journal | None |
Abstract
The original test results were not published by Hafele & Keating, in their famous 1972 paper; they published figures that were radically different from the actual test results which are here published for the first time. An analysis of the real data shows that no credence can be given to the conclusions of Hafele & Keating.