A Misapprehension Concerning Electric Current Neutrality: Difference between revisions
Imported from text file |
Imported from text file |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
[[Category:Scientific Paper|misapprehension concerning electric current neutrality]] | [[Category:Scientific Paper|misapprehension concerning electric current neutrality]] | ||
[[Category:Relativity]] | [[Category:Relativity|misapprehension concerning electric current neutrality]] | ||
[[Category:Electrodynamics]] | [[Category:Electrodynamics|misapprehension concerning electric current neutrality]] | ||
Latest revision as of 21:16, 1 January 2017
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | A Misapprehension Concerning Electric Current Neutrality |
| Author(s) | Dave Dameron, Thomas E Phipps, Michael H Brill |
| Keywords | Special Relativity, Electromagnetism, Electromagnetic Theory |
| Published | 2011 |
| Journal | Physics Essays |
| Volume | 24 |
| Number | 3 |
| No. of pages | 2 |
| Pages | 325-326 |
Abstract
It is generally thought that, when direct current flows in a stationary wire, no external electric field is produced. However, we show that if the Lorentz contraction of the assemblage of moving electrons is taken into account, special relativity theory predicts a nonzero electric field. Other theory also predicts nonzero electric fields through other mechanisms, and experimental works report confirmation of these mechanisms.