On the Failure of Simultaneity: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Imported from text file |
Imported from text file |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
A re-examination of Einstein?s argument for the failure of simultaneity identifies the hidden, and false, assumption of simultaneity for observations from frames in relative motion. Avoiding that error permits a simpler theory of relativity that reveals how both the schism of relativity and quantum theories and the contradictions and paradoxes of flexible space may proceed from the illusion of a common frame. A GPS satellite experiment is proposed to determine which view is correct. | A re-examination of Einstein?s argument for the failure of simultaneity identifies the hidden, and false, assumption of simultaneity for observations from frames in relative motion. Avoiding that error permits a simpler theory of relativity that reveals how both the schism of relativity and quantum theories and the contradictions and paradoxes of flexible space may proceed from the illusion of a common frame. A GPS satellite experiment is proposed to determine which view is correct. | ||
[[Category:Scientific Paper]] | [[Category:Scientific Paper|failure simultaneity]] | ||
[[Category:Relativity]] | [[Category:Relativity]] | ||
Revision as of 12:49, 1 January 2017
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | On the Failure of Simultaneity |
| Author(s) | Kevin J Parcell |
| Keywords | {{{keywords}}} |
| Published | 2007 |
| Journal | Galilean Electrodynamics |
| Volume | 18 |
| Number | 3 |
| Pages | 52-57 |
Abstract
A re-examination of Einstein?s argument for the failure of simultaneity identifies the hidden, and false, assumption of simultaneity for observations from frames in relative motion. Avoiding that error permits a simpler theory of relativity that reveals how both the schism of relativity and quantum theories and the contradictions and paradoxes of flexible space may proceed from the illusion of a common frame. A GPS satellite experiment is proposed to determine which view is correct.