On Reviving Tired Light: Difference between revisions
Imported from text file |
Imported from text file |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
<span style="FONT-FAMILY: TimesNewRoman"> Halton Arp has recently (1989) presented empirical criticisms of the validity of tired-light mechanisms as an explanation of anomalous redshifts. This is extremely welcome and represents the beginning of a true discussion among those who are not content with standard big bang cosmology. The unorthodox theories are legion: there almost as many theories as there are unorthodox thinkers in this domain. This situation is not conducive to advances in our understanding of a difficult problem. Therefore discussion, and even dispute, are necessary, unavoidable and useful. And who has greater right to initiate the discussion than Chip Arp, the pioneer of the field? | <span style="FONT-FAMILY: TimesNewRoman"> Halton Arp has recently (1989) presented empirical criticisms of the validity of tired-light mechanisms as an explanation of anomalous redshifts. This is extremely welcome and represents the beginning of a true discussion among those who are not content with standard big bang cosmology. The unorthodox theories are legion: there almost as many theories as there are unorthodox thinkers in this domain. This situation is not conducive to advances in our understanding of a difficult problem. Therefore discussion, and even dispute, are necessary, unavoidable and useful. And who has greater right to initiate the discussion than Chip Arp, the pioneer of the field? | ||
</span> | </span> | ||
[[Category:Cosmology]] | [[Category:Scientific Paper|reviving tired light]] | ||
[[Category:Cosmology|reviving tired light]] | |||
Latest revision as of 21:46, 1 January 2017
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | On Reviving Tired Light |
| Read in full | Link to paper |
| Author(s) | Toivo Jaakkola |
| Keywords | Tired light |
| Published | 1990 |
| Journal | Apeiron |
| Volume | 1 |
| Number | 6 |
| No. of pages | 6 |
| Pages | 5-6 |
Read the full paper here
Abstract
Halton Arp has recently (1989) presented empirical criticisms of the validity of tired-light mechanisms as an explanation of anomalous redshifts. This is extremely welcome and represents the beginning of a true discussion among those who are not content with standard big bang cosmology. The unorthodox theories are legion: there almost as many theories as there are unorthodox thinkers in this domain. This situation is not conducive to advances in our understanding of a difficult problem. Therefore discussion, and even dispute, are necessary, unavoidable and useful. And who has greater right to initiate the discussion than Chip Arp, the pioneer of the field?