Jump to content

Newton vs. Einstein: Difference between revisions

From Natural Philosophy Wiki
Imported from text file
 
Imported from text file
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 18: Line 18:
<span style="FONT-SIZE: x-small; FONT-FAMILY: Times New Roman"><span style="FONT-SIZE: x-small; FONT-FAMILY: Times New Roman">      This paper demonstrates that the redshift of galaxies and quasars is due to a ?gravitational braking? of light and not to a so-called expansion of the universe. It shows further that the velocity of any material body in movement with respect to ?the cosmological background? will progressively decrease and eventually cancel out. Moreover, any movement is absolute and independent of an observer, and the GRT gives here erroneous results.
<span style="FONT-SIZE: x-small; FONT-FAMILY: Times New Roman"><span style="FONT-SIZE: x-small; FONT-FAMILY: Times New Roman">      This paper demonstrates that the redshift of galaxies and quasars is due to a ?gravitational braking? of light and not to a so-called expansion of the universe. It shows further that the velocity of any material body in movement with respect to ?the cosmological background? will progressively decrease and eventually cancel out. Moreover, any movement is absolute and independent of an observer, and the GRT gives here erroneous results.


</span></span>[[Category:Scientific Paper]]
</span></span>


[[Category:Gravity]]
[[Category:Scientific Paper|newton vs einstein]]
 
[[Category:Gravity|newton vs einstein]]

Latest revision as of 21:45, 1 January 2017

Scientific Paper
TitleNewton vs. Einstein
Read in fullLink to paper
Author(s)Marcel Luttgens
Keywordsredshift, gravitational braking
Published1998
JournalApeiron
Volume5
Number1-2
No. of pages5
Pages25-30

Read the full paper here

Abstract

This paper demonstrates that the redshift of galaxies and quasars is due to a ?gravitational braking? of light and not to a so-called expansion of the universe. It shows further that the velocity of any material body in movement with respect to ?the cosmological background? will progressively decrease and eventually cancel out. Moreover, any movement is absolute and independent of an observer, and the GRT gives here erroneous results.