Nonlocality, Unreality, and Bell Theorem: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Imported from text file |
Imported from text file |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
I argue that Bell?s argument for nonlocality is the result of an error in the use of Bayes? formula. By correcting this error all derivations of Bell Inequalities become impossible. Further, I show by direct construction and simulation that the data from EPR- and GHZ-type experiments can be explained by the classical formulas for higher order correlations. Additionally, I argue that irreality is a consequence of the assumption that QM is complete. Superposition of mutually exclusive states arise in classical mechanics for coupled oscillators where the energy sloshes back and forth between two modes.[[Category:Scientific Paper]] | I argue that Bell?s argument for nonlocality is the result of an error in the use of Bayes? formula. By correcting this error all derivations of Bell Inequalities become impossible. Further, I show by direct construction and simulation that the data from EPR- and GHZ-type experiments can be explained by the classical formulas for higher order correlations. Additionally, I argue that irreality is a consequence of the assumption that QM is complete. Superposition of mutually exclusive states arise in classical mechanics for coupled oscillators where the energy sloshes back and forth between two modes. | ||
[[Category:Scientific Paper|nonlocality unreality bell theorem]] | |||
Latest revision as of 12:46, 1 January 2017
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Nonlocality, Unreality, and Bell Theorem |
| Author(s) | Al F Kracklauer |
| Keywords | {{{keywords}}} |
| Published | 2006 |
| Journal | None |
Abstract
I argue that Bell?s argument for nonlocality is the result of an error in the use of Bayes? formula. By correcting this error all derivations of Bell Inequalities become impossible. Further, I show by direct construction and simulation that the data from EPR- and GHZ-type experiments can be explained by the classical formulas for higher order correlations. Additionally, I argue that irreality is a consequence of the assumption that QM is complete. Superposition of mutually exclusive states arise in classical mechanics for coupled oscillators where the energy sloshes back and forth between two modes.