Commentary on Sub-Quantum Physics: Difference between revisions
Imported from text file |
Imported from text file |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
All attempts to reconcile quantum theory with true science will be futile because the underlying assumptions and methods are different. The underlying dogma of quantum theory is its denial of causality and assertion of randomness. Those who believe truth is tested by the law of non-contradiction cannot accept the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle or models (such as Sub-Quantum Physics) that assume the HUP.[[Category:Scientific Paper]] | All attempts to reconcile quantum theory with true science will be futile because the underlying assumptions and methods are different. The underlying dogma of quantum theory is its denial of causality and assertion of randomness. Those who believe truth is tested by the law of non-contradiction cannot accept the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle or models (such as Sub-Quantum Physics) that assume the HUP. | ||
[[Category:Scientific Paper|commentary sub-quantum physics]] | |||
Latest revision as of 12:09, 1 January 2017
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Commentary on Sub-Quantum Physics |
| Author(s) | David L Bergman |
| Keywords | {{{keywords}}} |
| Published | 2010 |
| Journal | Foundations of Science |
| Volume | 13 |
| Number | 3 |
| No. of pages | 6 |
Abstract
All attempts to reconcile quantum theory with true science will be futile because the underlying assumptions and methods are different. The underlying dogma of quantum theory is its denial of causality and assertion of randomness. Those who believe truth is tested by the law of non-contradiction cannot accept the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle or models (such as Sub-Quantum Physics) that assume the HUP.