Interstellar Drives: Difference between revisions
Imported from text file |
Imported from text file |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
Proposals for interplanetary travel abound. Their common shortcoming is they rely on the intervention of major new technologies, like warp drives and teleportation. These, in turn, often rely on new laws of physics that would admit, for example, interdimensional travel and antigravity. This paper lists some of the far-out prospects more widely accepted by, believe it or not, professional scientists, and highlights their shortcomings. | Proposals for interplanetary travel abound. Their common shortcoming is they rely on the intervention of major new technologies, like warp drives and teleportation. These, in turn, often rely on new laws of physics that would admit, for example, interdimensional travel and antigravity. This paper lists some of the far-out prospects more widely accepted by, believe it or not, professional scientists, and highlights their shortcomings. | ||
[[Category:Gravity]] | [[Category:Scientific Paper|interstellar drives]] | ||
[[Category:Gravity|interstellar drives]] | |||
Latest revision as of 21:38, 1 January 2017
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Interstellar Drives |
| Author(s) | David Rosignoli |
| Keywords | exotic matter, hyperspace, interstellar travel, teleportation, worm holes |
| Published | 2008 |
| Journal | Electric Spacecraft Journal |
| Number | 44 |
| Pages | 8-12 |
Abstract
Proposals for interplanetary travel abound. Their common shortcoming is they rely on the intervention of major new technologies, like warp drives and teleportation. These, in turn, often rely on new laws of physics that would admit, for example, interdimensional travel and antigravity. This paper lists some of the far-out prospects more widely accepted by, believe it or not, professional scientists, and highlights their shortcomings.