Logical Analysis of Special Relativity: Difference between revisions
Imported from text file |
Imported from text file |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
[[Category:Scientific Paper|logical analysis special relativity]] | [[Category:Scientific Paper|logical analysis special relativity]] | ||
[[Category:Relativity]] | [[Category:Relativity|logical analysis special relativity]] | ||
Latest revision as of 21:40, 1 January 2017
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Logical Analysis of Special Relativity |
| Author(s) | John E Chappell |
| Keywords | Special Relativity |
| Published | 1998 |
| Journal | None |
Abstract
Special relativity (SR) is a construct of the subcultur. of physics, not a certain reflection of reality. It is inferior to various other theories that explain the same evidence because It is based on Invalid logic: its two postulates contradict each other, and each commits the fallacy of misplaced concreteness. The simultaneity thought experillent 15 totl:l1ly invalidated by violating the law of noncontradiction; suggestions are made on how to reinterpret it rationally in terms of aether theory.