Three Arguments on the Nature of Space: Difference between revisions
Imported from text file |
Imported from text file |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
[[Category:Scientific Paper|arguments nature space]] | [[Category:Scientific Paper|arguments nature space]] | ||
[[Category:Gravity]] | [[Category:Gravity|arguments nature space]] | ||
Latest revision as of 22:09, 1 January 2017
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Three Arguments on the Nature of Space |
| Author(s) | John B Kizer |
| Keywords | nature, space, geometry, general relativity, Maxwell's equations, Lesagian particles, waves |
| Published | 1983 |
| Journal | None |
| Pages | 39-43 |
Abstract
The best and simplest models of reality are visualizable models as opposed to formal models. It is proved that non-Euclidean geometry only exists as a special case of a higher dimensional Euclidean geometry, thereby negating general relativity.
The infalling saves of Maxwell's equations, a perennial problem for electrodynamics theorists, can be explained as Lesagian particles (or waves).
A consistent theory of the Lorentz transformation is developed, including a new explanation of the Airy experiment.