Jump to content

Mechanics of Particles in the Fractal Cosmos: Difference between revisions

From Natural Philosophy Wiki
Imported from text file
Imported from text file
 
Line 19: Line 19:
[[Category:Scientific Paper|mechanics particles fractal cosmos]]
[[Category:Scientific Paper|mechanics particles fractal cosmos]]


[[Category:Relativity]]
[[Category:Relativity|mechanics particles fractal cosmos]]

Latest revision as of 21:42, 1 January 2017

Scientific Paper
TitleMechanics of Particles in the Fractal Cosmos
Read in fullLink to paper
Author(s)Harry A Schmitz
Keywords{{{keywords}}}
Published2004
JournalProceedings of the NPA
Volume1
Number1
No. of pages4
Pages100-102

Read the full paper here

Abstract

A fractal particle is a three-dimensional (3D) standing wave (SW) superimposed on much smaller fractal particles, which comprise the finite substrate of one universe within a hierarchical series of fractal universes, or a fractal cosmos.  In this presentation, units of absolute time and length are defined with respect to the fram or a fractal cosmos.  In this presentation, units of absolute time and length are defined with respect to the frame of reference of a fractal universe.  It is then shown that, for a fractal particle in motion, the frequency of vibration decreases (clock retardation) and the wavelength decreases in the direction of motion (length contraction) as the velocity of the particle increases with respect to the rest frame of (i.e., zero-velocity in) the fractal universe.  Predications are in agreement with experimental results, yet the equations of "fractal mechanics" are derived without recorse to the controversial two principles of Einstein's special relativity theory (SRT).  The present derivation is based on Newtonian mechanics as applied to the built-in clocks and rulers of a fractal particle.  It is indicated that Einstein's ad hoc derivation is preposterous and superfluous in the context of the fractal cosmos and leads to unnecessary paradoxes.  In conclusion, the fractal cosmos hypothesis is compatible with experimental results relating to clock retardation and length contraction, suggesting that it is a robust theory worth examining in greater detail.