Inertial Gravity and Cosmology: Difference between revisions
Imported from text file |
Imported from text file |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
If inertial effects are merely gravitational effects (the Berkeley-Mach hypothesis), and if the laws of nature are the same everywhere (the costnological principle), it seems probable that (1) the universe is infinitely great, is not expanding, and is neither open nor closed (2) the cosmic redshift is not a Doppler effect (3) the hypothetical big bang did not occur. Two important words: seems probable. | If inertial effects are merely gravitational effects (the Berkeley-Mach hypothesis), and if the laws of nature are the same everywhere (the costnological principle), it seems probable that (1) the universe is infinitely great, is not expanding, and is neither open nor closed (2) the cosmic redshift is not a Doppler effect (3) the hypothetical big bang did not occur. Two important words: seems probable. | ||
[[Category:Gravity]] | [[Category:Scientific Paper|inertial gravity cosmology]] | ||
[[Category:Gravity|inertial gravity cosmology]] | |||
Latest revision as of 21:38, 1 January 2017
| Scientific Paper | |
|---|---|
| Title | Inertial Gravity and Cosmology |
| Author(s) | Lee Coe |
| Keywords | gravity and inertia, theoretical cosmology, origin and formation of the universe, redshift, big bang |
| Published | 1988 |
| Journal | Physics Essays |
| Volume | 1 |
| Number | 1 |
| Pages | 33-44 |
Abstract
If inertial effects are merely gravitational effects (the Berkeley-Mach hypothesis), and if the laws of nature are the same everywhere (the costnological principle), it seems probable that (1) the universe is infinitely great, is not expanding, and is neither open nor closed (2) the cosmic redshift is not a Doppler effect (3) the hypothetical big bang did not occur. Two important words: seems probable.