Unipolar Induction Experiments and Relativistic Electrodynamics - Revision history

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-02T03:11:46Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:11, 1 January 2017
Line 16:		Line 16:
	[[Category:Scientific Paper\|unipolar induction experiments relativistic electrodynamics]]		[[Category:Scientific Paper\|unipolar induction experiments relativistic electrodynamics]]

	[[Category:Relativity]]		[[Category:Relativity\|unipolar induction experiments relativistic electrodynamics]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-01T18:35:38Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:35, 1 January 2017
Line 12:		Line 12:
	==Abstract==		==Abstract==

	The relativistic requirement of relative motion between a conductor and a magnet to produce electromagnetic induction is critically re-examined both historically and by original experiments. That no such requirement is needed for a rotating system was demonstrated by Kennard in 1917 and is acknowledged by some relativists, who have therefore resorted to General Relativity for an explanation of the rotational unipolar inductor. But the additional experimental tests with a modified, rectilinear version of the unipolar inductor reported here rule out General Relativity as well. There appears therefore to be a need for some new theoretical formulation of the problem, based either on classical (Maxwellian or Amperian) electrodynamics or on an altogether new approach.[[Category:Scientific Paper]]		The relativistic requirement of relative motion between a conductor and a magnet to produce electromagnetic induction is critically re-examined both historically and by original experiments. That no such requirement is needed for a rotating system was demonstrated by Kennard in 1917 and is acknowledged by some relativists, who have therefore resorted to General Relativity for an explanation of the rotational unipolar inductor. But the additional experimental tests with a modified, rectilinear version of the unipolar inductor reported here rule out General Relativity as well. There appears therefore to be a need for some new theoretical formulation of the problem, based either on classical (Maxwellian or Amperian) electrodynamics or on an altogether new approach.

			[[Category:Scientific Paper\|unipolar induction experiments relativistic electrodynamics]]

	[[Category:Relativity]]		[[Category:Relativity]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2016-12-30T05:18:21Z

Imported from text file

New page

{{Infobox paper
| title = Unipolar Induction Experiments and Relativistic Electrodynamics
| author = [[Francisco J M?ller]]
| keywords = [[unipolar induction]], [[relativistic electrodynamics]], [[motion]], [[conductor]], [[magnet]], [[General Relativity]]
| published = 1990
| journal = [[Galilean Electrodynamics]]
| volume = [[1]]
| number = [[3]]
| pages = 27-31
}}

==Abstract==

The relativistic requirement of relative motion between a conductor and a magnet to produce electromagnetic induction is critically re-examined both historically and by original experiments. That no such requirement is needed for a rotating system was demonstrated by Kennard in 1917 and is acknowledged by some relativists, who have therefore resorted to General Relativity for an explanation of the rotational unipolar inductor. But the additional experimental tests with a modified, rectilinear version of the unipolar inductor reported here rule out General Relativity as well. There appears therefore to be a need for some new theoretical formulation of the problem, based either on classical (Maxwellian or Amperian) electrodynamics or on an altogether new approach.[[Category:Scientific Paper]]

[[Category:Relativity]]