To Produce Superluminal Particles - Revision history

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-02T03:10:30Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:10, 1 January 2017
Line 19:		Line 19:
	[[Category:Scientific Paper\|produce superluminal particles]]		[[Category:Scientific Paper\|produce superluminal particles]]

	[[Category:Relativity]]		[[Category:Relativity\|produce superluminal particles]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-01T18:32:55Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:32, 1 January 2017
Line 2:		Line 2:
	\| title = To Produce Superluminal Particles		\| title = To Produce Superluminal Particles
	\| url = [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_5801.pdf Link to paper]		\| url = [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_5801.pdf Link to paper]
	\| author = [[Joseph J. Smulsky]]		\| author = [[Joseph J Smulsky]]
	\| published = 1997		\| published = 1997
	\| journal = [[Special Relativity Letter]]		\| journal = [[Special Relativity Letter]]
Line 15:		Line 15:
	==Abstract==		==Abstract==

	<div style="text-align: justify;"> Subject matter: 1. Any topic associated with the debate about special relativity (SR). But note that all SR conclusions are self-contradictory and mathematically invalid: the very notion of experimental verification is a category error; discussions of experimental aspects are therefore excluded. 2. Mathematical aspects of SR kinematics, and concepts associated with It (simultaneity, contraction, time dilation, etc.). Note that the 40 model is the result of a conceptual error; papers In the Minkowski tradition will not be considered. 3. Concepts of physics (space, time etc.). The critical debate shows that the virtue of reticence on concepts has left the field to ambitious and garrulous philosophers, who are typically afflicted with skepticism and lack common sense and that intuitive sense without which physics cannot be done. The task Is daunting and we are on shifting ground. To lay new foundations the study of concepts (philosophy). mathematics (methods of quantification) and physics must be integrated. </div>[[Category:Scientific Paper]]		<div style="text-align: justify;"> Subject matter: 1. Any topic associated with the debate about special relativity (SR). But note that all SR conclusions are self-contradictory and mathematically invalid: the very notion of experimental verification is a category error; discussions of experimental aspects are therefore excluded. 2. Mathematical aspects of SR kinematics, and concepts associated with It (simultaneity, contraction, time dilation, etc.). Note that the 40 model is the result of a conceptual error; papers In the Minkowski tradition will not be considered. 3. Concepts of physics (space, time etc.). The critical debate shows that the virtue of reticence on concepts has left the field to ambitious and garrulous philosophers, who are typically afflicted with skepticism and lack common sense and that intuitive sense without which physics cannot be done. The task Is daunting and we are on shifting ground. To lay new foundations the study of concepts (philosophy). mathematics (methods of quantification) and physics must be integrated. </div>

			[[Category:Scientific Paper\|produce superluminal particles]]

	[[Category:Relativity]]		[[Category:Relativity]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2016-12-30T01:34:42Z

Imported from text file

New page

{{Infobox paper
| title = To Produce Superluminal Particles
| url = [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_5801.pdf Link to paper]
| author = [[Joseph J. Smulsky]]
| published = 1997
| journal = [[Special Relativity Letter]]
| volume = [[1]]
| number = [[3]]
| num_pages = 3
| pages = 47-49
}}

'''Read the full paper''' [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_5801.pdf here]

==Abstract==

<div style="text-align: justify;"> Subject matter: 1. Any topic associated with the debate about special relativity (SR). But note that all SR conclusions are self-contradictory and mathematically invalid: the very notion of experimental verification is a category error; discussions of experimental aspects are therefore excluded. 2. Mathematical aspects of SR kinematics, and concepts associated with It (simultaneity, contraction, time dilation, etc.). Note that the 40 model is the result of a conceptual error; papers In the Minkowski tradition will not be considered. 3. Concepts of physics (space, time etc.). The critical debate shows that the virtue of reticence on concepts has left the field to ambitious and garrulous philosophers, who are typically afflicted with skepticism and lack common sense and that intuitive sense without which physics cannot be done. The task Is daunting and we are on shifting ground. To lay new foundations the study of concepts (philosophy). mathematics (methods of quantification) and physics must be integrated. </div>[[Category:Scientific Paper]]

[[Category:Relativity]]