The Unipolar Dynamotor: A Genuine Relational Engine - Revision history

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-02T03:09:22Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:09, 1 January 2017
Line 20:		Line 20:
	[[Category:Scientific Paper\|unipolar dynamotor genuine relational engine]]		[[Category:Scientific Paper\|unipolar dynamotor genuine relational engine]]

	[[Category:Relativity]]		[[Category:Relativity\|unipolar dynamotor genuine relational engine]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-01T18:30:26Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:30, 1 January 2017
Line 16:		Line 16:
	==Abstract==		==Abstract==

	We describe two quasi trivial, old fashioned, but cleverly conceived, undisputable, experiments which disprove Kennard-type absolutistic interpretations of unipolar machines. Our findings are in agreement with Weber's statements concerning the role of relative motion in electrodynamics, as advanced by himself towards the middle of the 19th century. And also we agree with Mach's views concerning motion at the most general level. This work settles our earlier contributions devoted to unipolar induction. For nearly a century after its discovery by Faraday in 1832 the unipolar generator was a conundrum for the theory of electromagnetism D. F. Bartlett et al. Phys. Rev D 16 (12), 3459 (1977). We are to admit no more causes of natural things than such as are both true and sufficient to explain their appearances. - Isaac Newton[[Category:Scientific Paper]]		We describe two quasi trivial, old fashioned, but cleverly conceived, undisputable, experiments which disprove Kennard-type absolutistic interpretations of unipolar machines. Our findings are in agreement with Weber's statements concerning the role of relative motion in electrodynamics, as advanced by himself towards the middle of the 19th century. And also we agree with Mach's views concerning motion at the most general level. This work settles our earlier contributions devoted to unipolar induction. For nearly a century after its discovery by Faraday in 1832 the unipolar generator was a conundrum for the theory of electromagnetism D. F. Bartlett et al. Phys. Rev D 16 (12), 3459 (1977). We are to admit no more causes of natural things than such as are both true and sufficient to explain their appearances. - Isaac Newton

			[[Category:Scientific Paper\|unipolar dynamotor genuine relational engine]]

	[[Category:Relativity]]		[[Category:Relativity]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2016-12-30T15:33:50Z

Imported from text file

New page

{{Infobox paper
| title = The Unipolar Dynamotor: A Genuine Relational Engine
| url = [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_644.pdf Link to paper]
| author = [[Jorge A Guala-Valverde]], [[Pedro Mazzoni]]
| keywords = [[relational physics]], [[unipolar devices]], [[Weber' statements]]
| published = 2001
| journal = [[Apeiron]]
| volume = [[8]]
| number = [[4]]
| num_pages = 12
| pages = 41-52
}}

'''Read the full paper''' [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_644.pdf here]

==Abstract==

We describe two quasi trivial, old fashioned, but cleverly conceived, undisputable, experiments which disprove Kennard-type absolutistic interpretations of unipolar machines. Our findings are in agreement with Weber's statements concerning the role of relative motion in electrodynamics, as advanced by himself towards the middle of the 19th century. And also we agree with Mach's views concerning motion at the most general level. This work settles our earlier contributions devoted to unipolar induction. For nearly a century after its discovery by Faraday in 1832 the unipolar generator was a conundrum for the theory of electromagnetism D. F. Bartlett et al. Phys. Rev D 16 (12), 3459 (1977). We are to admit no more causes of natural things than such as are both true and sufficient to explain their appearances. - Isaac Newton[[Category:Scientific Paper]]

[[Category:Relativity]]