Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-01T18:15:28Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:15, 1 January 2017
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Infobox paper		{{Infobox paper
	\| title = The Forbidden Equation: i = qc		\| title = The Forbidden Equation: i = qc
	\| url = [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/~~abstracts_paperlink_7393~~.pdf Link to paper]		\| url = [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_paperlink_7395.pdf Link to paper]
	\| author = [[Forrest Bishop]]		\| author = [[Forrest Bishop]]
	\| keywords = [[Catt question]], [[electric current]], [[Maxwell Equations]], [[transmission line]], [[electric charge]], [[electromagnetism]]		\| keywords = [[Catt question]], [[electric current]], [[Maxwell Equations]], [[transmission line]], [[electric charge]], [[electromagnetism]]
Line 8:		Line 8:
	}}		}}

	'''Read the full paper''' [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/~~abstracts_paperlink_7393~~.pdf here]		'''Read the full paper''' [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_paperlink_7395.pdf here]

	==Abstract==		==Abstract==

	<em>Mr. ~~Bishop’s~~ label "the forbidden equation" is actually quite appropriate. But, it is not just because he has found no one else who mentions or uses it; rather, it is because it should be forbidden from physics, not admired as a new discovery about physics.</em>- Prof. William A. Gardner, Electrical Engineering, UC Davis		<em>Mr. Bishop’s label "the forbidden equation" is actually quite appropriate. But, it is not just because he has found </em><em>no one else who mentions or uses it; rather, it is because it should be forbidden from physics, not admired as a new discovery about physics.</em> - Prof. William A. Gardner, Electrical Engineering, UC Davis

	There is any number of equations used to describe electric current. But there is one simple equation that is seldom to be found in any Academic textbook or Peer-reviewed journal article. Yet what I've named "The Forbidden Equation", <em>i=qc</em>, is nothing more or less than the defining equation of electric current, with <em>i</em> the electric current, <em>q</em> the net line charge per unit length, and <em>c</em> the speed of light. It is apparent why this equation is buried so deeply as to be unheard of- it destroys the idea of electric current, and all that descends from that idea, by its very definition. There have been a few recent sightings of The Forbidden Equation, all curiously enough in papers addressing The Catt Question.		There is any number of equations used to describe electric current. But there is one simple equation that<br /> is seldom to be found in any Academic textbook or Peer-reviewed journal article. Yet what I’ve named "The<br /> Forbidden Equation", <em>i = qc</em>, is nothing more or less than the defining equation of electric current, with <em>i</em> the electric current, <em>q</em> the net line charge per unit length, and <em>c</em> the speed of light. It is apparent why this equation is buried so deeply as to be unheard of- it destroys the idea of electric current, and all that descends from that idea, by its very definition. There have been a few recent sightings of The Forbidden Equation, all curiously enough in papers addressing The Catt Question.

	<em>i=qc</em> is a mainstream equation, inseparably contained within their other electromagnetic equations and easily derived from them using elementary algebra. It is ~~Gardner’s~~ Equation, ~~Maxwell’s~~ Equation, and ~~Einstein’s~~ Equation as well. Behold the abyss.		<em>i = qc</em> is a mainstream equation, inseparably contained within their other electromagnetic equations and<br /> easily derived from them using elementary algebra. It is Gardner’s Equation, Maxwell’s Equation, and Einstein’s<br /> Equation as well. Behold the abyss.

	[[Category:Scientific Paper]]		[[Category:Scientific Paper\|]]

	~~[[Category:Cosmology]]~~
	[[Category:Electrodynamics]]		[[Category:Electrodynamics]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2016-12-30T18:40:47Z

Imported from text file

New page

{{Infobox paper
| title = The Forbidden Equation: i = qc
| url = [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_paperlink_7393.pdf Link to paper]
| author = [[Forrest Bishop]]
| keywords = [[Catt question]], [[electric current]], [[Maxwell Equations]], [[transmission line]], [[electric charge]], [[electromagnetism]]
| published = 2016
| num_pages = 14
}}

'''Read the full paper''' [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_paperlink_7393.pdf here]

==Abstract==

Mr. Bishop’s label "the forbidden equation" is actually quite appropriate. But, it is not just because he has found no one else who mentions or uses it; rather, it is because it should be forbidden from physics, not admired as a new discovery about physics.- Prof. William A. Gardner, Electrical Engineering, UC Davis

There is any number of equations used to describe electric current. But there is one simple equation that is seldom to be found in any Academic textbook or Peer-reviewed journal article. Yet what I've named "The Forbidden Equation", i=qc, is nothing more or less than the defining equation of electric current, with i the electric current, q the net line charge per unit length, and c the speed of light. It is apparent why this equation is buried so deeply as to be unheard of- it destroys the idea of electric current, and all that descends from that idea, by its very definition. There have been a few recent sightings of The Forbidden Equation, all curiously enough in papers addressing The Catt Question.

i=qc is a mainstream equation, inseparably contained within their other electromagnetic equations and easily derived from them using elementary algebra. It is Gardner’s Equation, Maxwell’s Equation, and Einstein’s Equation as well. Behold the abyss.

[[Category:Scientific Paper]]

[[Category:Cosmology]]
[[Category:Electrodynamics]]

The Forbidden Equation: i = qc - Revision history

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

Maintenance script: Imported from text file