The Electrodynamic Interpretation of Mass Variation - Revision history

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-02T03:01:01Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:01, 1 January 2017
Line 13:		Line 13:
	[[Category:Scientific Paper\|electrodynamic interpretation mass variation]]		[[Category:Scientific Paper\|electrodynamic interpretation mass variation]]

	[[Category:Relativity]]		[[Category:Relativity\|electrodynamic interpretation mass variation]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-01T18:13:23Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:13, 1 January 2017
Line 9:		Line 9:
	==Abstract==		==Abstract==

	The paper considers the special case of a charged particle moving in a uniform electric field. Three formulations of the problem are compared, utilizing the Weber equation. and the new Gaussian equation. The critical difference is whether the force is defined in terms of absolute velocity (classical) or relative velocity (Weber and new Gaussian). The actual trajectory of the charged particle can be explained in two ways: if the force is a function of absolute velocity it is necessary to introduce a variable mass. However. if the force is a function of relative velocity the correct trajectory is predicted with a constant mass. Consequently. both the Weber Equation and the new Gaussian equation explain the experimental trajectories of charged particles in a uniform electric field with a mass which does not vary.[[Category:Scientific Paper]]		The paper considers the special case of a charged particle moving in a uniform electric field. Three formulations of the problem are compared, utilizing the Weber equation. and the new Gaussian equation. The critical difference is whether the force is defined in terms of absolute velocity (classical) or relative velocity (Weber and new Gaussian). The actual trajectory of the charged particle can be explained in two ways: if the force is a function of absolute velocity it is necessary to introduce a variable mass. However. if the force is a function of relative velocity the correct trajectory is predicted with a constant mass. Consequently. both the Weber Equation and the new Gaussian equation explain the experimental trajectories of charged particles in a uniform electric field with a mass which does not vary.

			[[Category:Scientific Paper\|electrodynamic interpretation mass variation]]

	[[Category:Relativity]]		[[Category:Relativity]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2016-12-30T02:21:14Z

Imported from text file

New page

{{Infobox paper
| title = The Electrodynamic Interpretation of Mass Variation
| author = [[Domina Eberle Spencer]], [[Uma Y Shama]], [[Philip J Mann]]
| keywords = [[Electrodynamics]], [[Mass Variation]]
| published = 1999
| journal = [[None]]
}}

==Abstract==

The paper considers the special case of a charged particle moving in a uniform electric field. Three formulations of the problem are compared, utilizing the Weber equation. and the new Gaussian equation. The critical difference is whether the force is defined in terms of absolute velocity (classical) or relative velocity (Weber and new Gaussian). The actual trajectory of the charged particle can be explained in two ways: if the force is a function of absolute velocity it is necessary to introduce a variable mass. However. if the force is a function of relative velocity the correct trajectory is predicted with a constant mass. Consequently. both the Weber Equation and the new Gaussian equation explain the experimental trajectories of charged particles in a uniform electric field with a mass which does not vary.[[Category:Scientific Paper]]

[[Category:Relativity]]