The Continuing Appeal of Einstein's Relativity - Revision history

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-02T03:00:00Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:00, 1 January 2017
Line 13:		Line 13:
	[[Category:Scientific Paper\|continuing appeal einstein 's relativity]]		[[Category:Scientific Paper\|continuing appeal einstein 's relativity]]

	[[Category:Relativity]]		[[Category:Relativity\|continuing appeal einstein 's relativity]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-01T18:11:44Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:11, 1 January 2017
Line 9:		Line 9:
	==Abstract==		==Abstract==

	Einstein's special theory of relativity is often attacked on the basis that relative motion cannot provide a standard of rest for the theory's claim that motion slows clocks and shortens in the forward direction. In spite of the plausibility of these complaints, "relativity" is widely held in high regard. The principle reason for this may be the failure to distinguish between the Lorentz formulae and Einstein's theory involving them. Reports of test experiments avoid Einstein's attention to motion as the effective force of change; treatises emphasize his deductions rather than his logic.[[Category:Scientific Paper]]		Einstein's special theory of relativity is often attacked on the basis that relative motion cannot provide a standard of rest for the theory's claim that motion slows clocks and shortens in the forward direction. In spite of the plausibility of these complaints, "relativity" is widely held in high regard. The principle reason for this may be the failure to distinguish between the Lorentz formulae and Einstein's theory involving them. Reports of test experiments avoid Einstein's attention to motion as the effective force of change; treatises emphasize his deductions rather than his logic.

			[[Category:Scientific Paper\|continuing appeal einstein 's relativity]]

	[[Category:Relativity]]		[[Category:Relativity]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2016-12-30T05:55:49Z

Imported from text file

New page

{{Infobox paper
| title = The Continuing Appeal of Einstein\'s Relativity
| author = [[Harry E Mongold]]
| published = 1990
| journal = [[Unpublished]]
| num_pages = 18
}}

==Abstract==

Einstein's special theory of relativity is often attacked on the basis that relative motion cannot provide a standard of rest for the theory's claim that motion slows clocks and shortens in the forward direction. In spite of the plausibility of these complaints, "relativity" is widely held in high regard. The principle reason for this may be the failure to distinguish between the Lorentz formulae and Einstein's theory involving them. Reports of test experiments avoid Einstein's attention to motion as the effective force of change; treatises emphasize his deductions rather than his logic.[[Category:Scientific Paper]]

[[Category:Relativity]]