<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>http://naturalphilosophy.org/wiki/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=The_Centrifugal_Force_Argument</id>
	<title>The Centrifugal Force Argument - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://naturalphilosophy.org/wiki/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=The_Centrifugal_Force_Argument"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://naturalphilosophy.org/wiki/index.php?title=The_Centrifugal_Force_Argument&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-05-25T11:34:40Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.0</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>http://naturalphilosophy.org/wiki/index.php?title=The_Centrifugal_Force_Argument&amp;diff=278094&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>DTombe: The Centrifugal Force Argument</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://naturalphilosophy.org/wiki/index.php?title=The_Centrifugal_Force_Argument&amp;diff=278094&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2019-05-14T19:09:31Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;The Centrifugal Force Argument&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;The modern teaching is that centrifugal force only exists as a fictitious force in a rotating frame of reference, and that the only force acting in an inertial frame of reference when a body undergoes circular motion is an inward acting centripetal force. On the contrary however, it is here proposed that a rotating frame of reference, rather than creating a fictitious centrifugal force, actually masks the existence of a very real inertial centripetal force that has gone unrecognized in the literature. When the books are correctly balanced, it will be demonstrated that centrifugal force is a real force, closely related to kinetic energy, and observable in any frame of reference.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>DTombe</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>