Surface Brightness in Plasma-Redshift Cosmology - Revision history

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-02T02:57:43Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:57, 1 January 2017
Line 13:		Line 13:
	[[Category:Scientific Paper\|surface brightness plasma-redshift cosmology]]		[[Category:Scientific Paper\|surface brightness plasma-redshift cosmology]]

	[[Category:Electric Universe]]		[[Category:Electric Universe\|surface brightness plasma-redshift cosmology]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-01T18:08:11Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:08, 1 January 2017
Line 9:		Line 9:
	==Abstract==		==Abstract==

	In 2001 Lori M. Lubin and Allan Sandage, using big-bang cosmology for interpreting the data, found the surface brightness of galaxies to be inversely proportional to about the third power of (1+z), while the contemporary big-bang cosmology predicts that the surface brightness is inversely proportional to the fourth power of (1+z). In contrast, these surface brightness observations are in agreement with the predictions of the plasma-redshift cosmology. Lubin and Sandage (2001) and Barden et al. (2005), who surmised the big-bang expansion, interpreted the observations to indicate that the diameters of galaxies are inversely proportional to (1+z). In contrast, when assuming plasma-redshift cosmology, the diameters of galaxies are observed to be constant independent of redshift and any expansion. Lubin and Sandage (2001) and Barden et al. (2005), when using big-bang cosmology, observed the average absolute magnitude of galaxies to decrease with redshift; while in plasma redshift cosmology it is a constant. Lubin and Sandage and Barden et al. suggested that a coherent evolution could explain the discrepancy between the observed relations and those predicted in the big-bang cosmology. We have failed to find support for this explanation. We consider the observed relations between the redshift and the surface-brightness, the galaxy diameter, and the absolute magnitude to be robust confirmations of plasma-redshift cosmology.. Comment: First presented at the NES-APS Meeting in Boston, MA, April 1, 2006. Only minor editorial changes from v1 to v2.[[Category:Scientific Paper]]		In 2001 Lori M. Lubin and Allan Sandage, using big-bang cosmology for interpreting the data, found the surface brightness of galaxies to be inversely proportional to about the third power of (1+z), while the contemporary big-bang cosmology predicts that the surface brightness is inversely proportional to the fourth power of (1+z). In contrast, these surface brightness observations are in agreement with the predictions of the plasma-redshift cosmology. Lubin and Sandage (2001) and Barden et al. (2005), who surmised the big-bang expansion, interpreted the observations to indicate that the diameters of galaxies are inversely proportional to (1+z). In contrast, when assuming plasma-redshift cosmology, the diameters of galaxies are observed to be constant independent of redshift and any expansion. Lubin and Sandage (2001) and Barden et al. (2005), when using big-bang cosmology, observed the average absolute magnitude of galaxies to decrease with redshift; while in plasma redshift cosmology it is a constant. Lubin and Sandage and Barden et al. suggested that a coherent evolution could explain the discrepancy between the observed relations and those predicted in the big-bang cosmology. We have failed to find support for this explanation. We consider the observed relations between the redshift and the surface-brightness, the galaxy diameter, and the absolute magnitude to be robust confirmations of plasma-redshift cosmology.. Comment: First presented at the NES-APS Meeting in Boston, MA, April 1, 2006. Only minor editorial changes from v1 to v2.

			[[Category:Scientific Paper\|surface brightness plasma-redshift cosmology]]

	[[Category:Electric Universe]]		[[Category:Electric Universe]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2016-12-30T17:17:08Z

Imported from text file

New page

{{Infobox paper
| title = Surface Brightness in Plasma-Redshift Cosmology
| author = [[Ari Brynjolfsson]]
| published = 2006
| journal = [[ArXiv]]
| num_pages = 16
}}

==Abstract==

In 2001 Lori M. Lubin and Allan Sandage, using big-bang cosmology for interpreting the data, found the surface brightness of galaxies to be inversely proportional to about the third power of (1+z), while the contemporary big-bang cosmology predicts that the surface brightness is inversely proportional to the fourth power of (1+z). In contrast, these surface brightness observations are in agreement with the predictions of the plasma-redshift cosmology. Lubin and Sandage (2001) and Barden et al. (2005), who surmised the big-bang expansion, interpreted the observations to indicate that the diameters of galaxies are inversely proportional to (1+z). In contrast, when assuming plasma-redshift cosmology, the diameters of galaxies are observed to be constant independent of redshift and any expansion. Lubin and Sandage (2001) and Barden et al. (2005), when using big-bang cosmology, observed the average absolute magnitude of galaxies to decrease with redshift; while in plasma redshift cosmology it is a constant. Lubin and Sandage and Barden et al. suggested that a coherent evolution could explain the discrepancy between the observed relations and those predicted in the big-bang cosmology. We have failed to find support for this explanation. We consider the observed relations between the redshift and the surface-brightness, the galaxy diameter, and the absolute magnitude to be robust confirmations of plasma-redshift cosmology.. Comment: First presented at the NES-APS Meeting in Boston, MA, April 1, 2006. Only minor editorial changes from v1 to v2.[[Category:Scientific Paper]]

[[Category:Electric Universe]]