Superluminal Speeds and Superconductivity - Revision history

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-02T02:57:37Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:57, 1 January 2017
Line 15:		Line 15:
	[[Category:Scientific Paper\|superluminal speeds superconductivity]]		[[Category:Scientific Paper\|superluminal speeds superconductivity]]

	[[Category:Relativity]]		[[Category:Relativity\|superluminal speeds superconductivity]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-01T18:08:02Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:08, 1 January 2017
Line 11:		Line 11:
	==Abstract==		==Abstract==

	Both superluminal velocities and superconductivity are shown to devolve naturally from the generalized equations of motion identified in an earlier paper1. The behavior of "mass" as it approaches and exceeds light speed under uniform acceleration is illustrated and the statistical anomaly of barrier potential tunnelling is resolved. A significant difference between the angular and linear velocities involved in orbital motion is identified. Introduction: Sufficient experimental evidence exists for superluminal velocities although such is not accepted by the scientific community. This is primarily due to the assumed limitations on light speed imposed by special relativity and classical electrodynamics as well as the lack of a sound theoretical basis for exceeding it. Conversely, superconductivity is a well-established and recognized phenomenon but it also suffers from the absence of a comprehensive theory. In the following, it is shown they are both readily explained by one theory and identified as the extreme positions of kinetic and potential energies.[[Category:Scientific Paper]]		Both superluminal velocities and superconductivity are shown to devolve naturally from the generalized equations of motion identified in an earlier paper1. The behavior of "mass" as it approaches and exceeds light speed under uniform acceleration is illustrated and the statistical anomaly of barrier potential tunnelling is resolved. A significant difference between the angular and linear velocities involved in orbital motion is identified. Introduction: Sufficient experimental evidence exists for superluminal velocities although such is not accepted by the scientific community. This is primarily due to the assumed limitations on light speed imposed by special relativity and classical electrodynamics as well as the lack of a sound theoretical basis for exceeding it. Conversely, superconductivity is a well-established and recognized phenomenon but it also suffers from the absence of a comprehensive theory. In the following, it is shown they are both readily explained by one theory and identified as the extreme positions of kinetic and potential energies.

			[[Category:Scientific Paper\|superluminal speeds superconductivity]]

	[[Category:Relativity]]		[[Category:Relativity]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2016-12-30T13:44:44Z

Imported from text file

New page

{{Infobox paper
| title = Superluminal Speeds and Superconductivity

| author = [[Walter Babin]]
| keywords = [[Superconductivity]], [[lightspeed limits]], [[Tunnelling efect]], [[Superluminal velocity]]
| published = 2003
| journal = [[General Science Journal]]
| num_pages = 4
}}

==Abstract==

Both superluminal velocities and superconductivity are shown to devolve naturally from the generalized equations of motion identified in an earlier paper1. The behavior of "mass" as it approaches and exceeds light speed under uniform acceleration is illustrated and the statistical anomaly of barrier potential tunnelling is resolved. A significant difference between the angular and linear velocities involved in orbital motion is identified. Introduction: Sufficient experimental evidence exists for superluminal velocities although such is not accepted by the scientific community. This is primarily due to the assumed limitations on light speed imposed by special relativity and classical electrodynamics as well as the lack of a sound theoretical basis for exceeding it. Conversely, superconductivity is a well-established and recognized phenomenon but it also suffers from the absence of a comprehensive theory. In the following, it is shown they are both readily explained by one theory and identified as the extreme positions of kinetic and potential energies.[[Category:Scientific Paper]]

[[Category:Relativity]]