Special Relativity is Not Needed - Revision history

DeHilster at 17:48, 9 April 2017

2017-04-09T17:48:43Z

@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 | num_pages = 2
 }}
-==Abstract==
+===Image of the Red Hair Spray Particles===
-Many people have proved to themselves that Special Relativity is wrong. They know about the paradoxes, they know about the bad assumptions, they know about the mathematical errors. And yet it is still hard to provide absolute proof that it is wrong. After all, there are many others that are proving it right. This paper describes two things that proved to me that Special Relativity is wrong. The model is wrong and the interpretation of what each observer sees is wrong. My conclusion is that the transformation of length, time, and mass are not needed.
+==References==
 [[Category:Relativity]]

DeHilster at 21:45, 27 March 2017

2017-03-27T21:45:51Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:45, 27 March 2017
Line 2:		Line 2:
	\| title = Special Relativity is Not Needed		\| title = Special Relativity is Not Needed
	\| author = [[Bob de Hilster]]		\| author = [[Bob de Hilster]]
			\| keywords = [[special relativity]]
	\| published = 2016		\| published = 2016
	\| num_pages = 2		\| num_pages = 2
Line 10:		Line 11:
	Many people have proved to themselves that Special Relativity is wrong. They know about the paradoxes, they know about the bad assumptions, they know about the mathematical errors. And yet it is still hard to provide absolute proof that it is wrong. After all, there are many others that are proving it right. This paper describes two things that proved to me that Special Relativity is wrong. The model is wrong and the interpretation of what each observer sees is wrong. My conclusion is that the transformation of length, time, and mass are not needed.		Many people have proved to themselves that Special Relativity is wrong. They know about the paradoxes, they know about the bad assumptions, they know about the mathematical errors. And yet it is still hard to provide absolute proof that it is wrong. After all, there are many others that are proving it right. This paper describes two things that proved to me that Special Relativity is wrong. The model is wrong and the interpretation of what each observer sees is wrong. My conclusion is that the transformation of length, time, and mass are not needed.

	[[Category:Scientific Paper\|]]		[[Category:Scientific Paper\|Scientific Paper]]

	[[Category:Relativity]]		[[Category:Relativity]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-01T18:05:48Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:05, 1 January 2017
Line 10:		Line 10:
	Many people have proved to themselves that Special Relativity is wrong. They know about the paradoxes, they know about the bad assumptions, they know about the mathematical errors. And yet it is still hard to provide absolute proof that it is wrong. After all, there are many others that are proving it right. This paper describes two things that proved to me that Special Relativity is wrong. The model is wrong and the interpretation of what each observer sees is wrong. My conclusion is that the transformation of length, time, and mass are not needed.		Many people have proved to themselves that Special Relativity is wrong. They know about the paradoxes, they know about the bad assumptions, they know about the mathematical errors. And yet it is still hard to provide absolute proof that it is wrong. After all, there are many others that are proving it right. This paper describes two things that proved to me that Special Relativity is wrong. The model is wrong and the interpretation of what each observer sees is wrong. My conclusion is that the transformation of length, time, and mass are not needed.

	[[Category:Scientific Paper]]		[[Category:Scientific Paper\|]]

	[[Category:Relativity]]		[[Category:Relativity]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2016-12-29T05:02:19Z

Imported from text file

New page

{{Infobox paper
| title = Special Relativity is Not Needed
| author = [[Bob de Hilster]]
| published = 2016
| num_pages = 2
}}

==Abstract==

Many people have proved to themselves that Special Relativity is wrong. They know about the paradoxes, they know about the bad assumptions, they know about the mathematical errors. And yet it is still hard to provide absolute proof that it is wrong. After all, there are many others that are proving it right. This paper describes two things that proved to me that Special Relativity is wrong. The model is wrong and the interpretation of what each observer sees is wrong. My conclusion is that the transformation of length, time, and mass are not needed.

[[Category:Scientific Paper]]

[[Category:Relativity]]