Some Critiques of the Big Bang Cosmology - Revision history

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-02T02:55:38Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:55, 1 January 2017
Line 19:		Line 19:
	[[Category:Scientific Paper\|some critiques big bang cosmology]]		[[Category:Scientific Paper\|some critiques big bang cosmology]]

	[[Category:Cosmology]]		[[Category:Cosmology\|some critiques big bang cosmology]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-01T18:04:34Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:04, 1 January 2017
Line 15:		Line 15:
	==Abstract==		==Abstract==

	Still more shocking than the metaphysical assumption of some initial singularity, is the constant insistence upon the so-called cosmological principle of ?homogeneity? and ?isotropy? of the Universe. Observations do contradict this principle. And to me, the inhomogeneous, fractal at least on a certain scale range, of the distribution of matter is in itself an important cosmological fact, hitherto almost neglected. Moreover difficultties as to the applicability of the second principle of thermodynamics, observations of abnormal redshifts, etc., are casting large doubts not only upon the standard cosmological models, but even on the interpretation of the observed redshift as due solely to a universal expansion.[[Category:Scientific Paper]]		Still more shocking than the metaphysical assumption of some initial singularity, is the constant insistence upon the so-called cosmological principle of ?homogeneity? and ?isotropy? of the Universe. Observations do contradict this principle. And to me, the inhomogeneous, fractal at least on a certain scale range, of the distribution of matter is in itself an important cosmological fact, hitherto almost neglected. Moreover difficultties as to the applicability of the second principle of thermodynamics, observations of abnormal redshifts, etc., are casting large doubts not only upon the standard cosmological models, but even on the interpretation of the observed redshift as due solely to a universal expansion.

			[[Category:Scientific Paper\|some critiques big bang cosmology]]

	[[Category:Cosmology]]		[[Category:Cosmology]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2016-12-30T16:30:43Z

Imported from text file

New page

{{Infobox paper
| title = Some Critiques of the Big Bang Cosmology
| url = [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_522.pdf Link to paper]
| author = [[Jean-Claude Pecker]]
| keywords = [[Cosmology]], [[Big Bang]]
| published = 1997
| journal = [[Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy]]
| volume = [[18]]
| num_pages = 11
| pages = 323-333
}}

'''Read the full paper''' [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_522.pdf here]

==Abstract==

Still more shocking than the metaphysical assumption of some initial singularity, is the constant insistence upon the so-called cosmological principle of ?homogeneity? and ?isotropy? of the Universe. Observations do contradict this principle. And to me, the inhomogeneous, fractal at least on a certain scale range, of the distribution of matter is in itself an important cosmological fact, hitherto almost neglected. Moreover difficultties as to the applicability of the second principle of thermodynamics, observations of abnormal redshifts, etc., are casting large doubts not only upon the standard cosmological models, but even on the interpretation of the observed redshift as due solely to a universal expansion.[[Category:Scientific Paper]]

[[Category:Cosmology]]