<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>http://naturalphilosophy.org/wiki/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Scientific_assumptions</id>
	<title>Scientific assumptions - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://naturalphilosophy.org/wiki/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Scientific_assumptions"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://naturalphilosophy.org/wiki/index.php?title=Scientific_assumptions&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-04-10T04:32:22Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.0</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>http://naturalphilosophy.org/wiki/index.php?title=Scientific_assumptions&amp;diff=6862&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>DeHilster at 16:27, 30 December 2016</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://naturalphilosophy.org/wiki/index.php?title=Scientific_assumptions&amp;diff=6862&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2016-12-30T16:27:08Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;table style=&quot;background-color: #fff; color: #202122;&quot; data-mw=&quot;interface&quot;&gt;
				&lt;col class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; /&gt;
				&lt;col class=&quot;diff-content&quot; /&gt;
				&lt;col class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; /&gt;
				&lt;col class=&quot;diff-content&quot; /&gt;
				&lt;tr class=&quot;diff-title&quot; lang=&quot;en&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; style=&quot;background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;← Older revision&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; style=&quot;background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;Revision as of 12:27, 30 December 2016&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; class=&quot;diff-lineno&quot; id=&quot;mw-diff-left-l4&quot;&gt;Line 4:&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; class=&quot;diff-lineno&quot;&gt;Line 4:&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;[[Neil Munch]] of the [[Natural Philosophy Alliance]] is considered to be the father of scientific assumptions. The stressed this fact with fellow scientists for almost two decades. Because of his relentlessness, many of today&amp;#039;s scientists in the [[John Chappell Natural Philosophy Society]] (and former members of the [[NPA]]) always state their assumptions up front in their scientific publications.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;[[Neil Munch]] of the [[Natural Philosophy Alliance]] is considered to be the father of scientific assumptions. The stressed this fact with fellow scientists for almost two decades. Because of his relentlessness, many of today&amp;#039;s scientists in the [[John Chappell Natural Philosophy Society]] (and former members of the [[NPA]]) always state their assumptions up front in their scientific publications.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;−&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;Prominent scientific philosopher Dr. [[Glenn Borchardt]] has authored the [[ten assumptions of science]] based and is considered by many to be &quot;the&quot; modern treatise on natural philosophy. &lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;Included in those ten &lt;/del&gt;assumptions &lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;of science are&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;+&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;Prominent scientific philosopher Dr. [[Glenn Borchardt]] has authored the [[&lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;The_Ten_Assumptions_of_Science:_Toward_a_New_Scientific_Worldview|&lt;/ins&gt;ten assumptions of science]] based and is considered by many to be &quot;the&quot; modern treatise on natural philosophy. &lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;These scientific &lt;/ins&gt;assumptions &lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;claim to be universal and must be followed by all scientists.&lt;/ins&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>DeHilster</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://naturalphilosophy.org/wiki/index.php?title=Scientific_assumptions&amp;diff=6562&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>DeHilster: Created page with &quot;One of the biggest downfalls of science today are the lack of stated scientific assumptions. Assumptions are those facts which cannot be disputed, verified, or proven but are...&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://naturalphilosophy.org/wiki/index.php?title=Scientific_assumptions&amp;diff=6562&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2016-12-30T16:22:23Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;quot;One of the biggest downfalls of science today are the lack of stated scientific assumptions. Assumptions are those facts which cannot be disputed, verified, or proven but are...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;One of the biggest downfalls of science today are the lack of stated scientific assumptions. Assumptions are those facts which cannot be disputed, verified, or proven but are on which all science is based. Most of mainstream science and science theory never state their assumptions and when carefully examined, fail because of conflicting &amp;quot;implied&amp;quot; assumptions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Neil Munch]] of the [[Natural Philosophy Alliance]] is considered to be the father of scientific assumptions. The stressed this fact with fellow scientists for almost two decades. Because of his relentlessness, many of today&amp;#039;s scientists in the [[John Chappell Natural Philosophy Society]] (and former members of the [[NPA]]) always state their assumptions up front in their scientific publications.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Prominent scientific philosopher Dr. [[Glenn Borchardt]] has authored the [[ten assumptions of science]] based and is considered by many to be &amp;quot;the&amp;quot; modern treatise on natural philosophy. Included in those ten assumptions of science are&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>DeHilster</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>