Questioning the Relativity of Inertia and Gravitation - Revision history

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-02T02:51:42Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:51, 1 January 2017
Line 20:		Line 20:
	[[Category:Scientific Paper\|questioning relativity inertia gravitation]]		[[Category:Scientific Paper\|questioning relativity inertia gravitation]]

	[[Category:Relativity]]		[[Category:Relativity\|questioning relativity inertia gravitation]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-01T17:57:53Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:57, 1 January 2017
Line 16:		Line 16:
	==Abstract==		==Abstract==

	Assuming that the Fitzgerald-Lorentz length-contraction as well as the Lorentz slowing-down of all electromagnetically-determined clocks are real phenomena, one draws the conclusion that the relativist Fitzgerald-Lorentz invariance is proper, exclusively, to electromagnetic systems. It is a theorem that may not be extended ? with an ?a priori? absolute certainty ? to systems containing inertial and/or gravitational active elements. That limitation is a draw-back of the fact that neither inertia nor gravitation was, till now, experimentally checked on a possible Fitzgerald-Lorentz invariance. At this aim two sorts of experiences ? one determined by gravity and inertia, the second by inertia alone ? are suggested and theoretically investigated by computational modeling. Approximate quantitative results are worked out via finite difference approximation run in an Excel programs.[[Category:Scientific Paper]]		Assuming that the Fitzgerald-Lorentz length-contraction as well as the Lorentz slowing-down of all electromagnetically-determined clocks are real phenomena, one draws the conclusion that the relativist Fitzgerald-Lorentz invariance is proper, exclusively, to electromagnetic systems. It is a theorem that may not be extended ? with an ?a priori? absolute certainty ? to systems containing inertial and/or gravitational active elements. That limitation is a draw-back of the fact that neither inertia nor gravitation was, till now, experimentally checked on a possible Fitzgerald-Lorentz invariance. At this aim two sorts of experiences ? one determined by gravity and inertia, the second by inertia alone ? are suggested and theoretically investigated by computational modeling. Approximate quantitative results are worked out via finite difference approximation run in an Excel programs.

			[[Category:Scientific Paper\|questioning relativity inertia gravitation]]

	[[Category:Relativity]]		[[Category:Relativity]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2016-12-30T05:02:49Z

Imported from text file

New page

{{Infobox paper
| title = Questioning the Relativity of Inertia and Gravitation
| url = [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_937.pdf Link to paper]
| author = [[Dan Romalo]]
| keywords = [[gravity]]
| published = 2007
| journal = [[Proceedings of the NPA]]
| volume = [[4]]
| number = [[2]]
| num_pages = 6
| pages = 220-226
}}

'''Read the full paper''' [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_937.pdf here]

==Abstract==

Assuming that the Fitzgerald-Lorentz length-contraction as well as the Lorentz slowing-down of all electromagnetically-determined clocks are real phenomena, one draws the conclusion that the relativist Fitzgerald-Lorentz invariance is proper, exclusively, to electromagnetic systems. It is a theorem that may not be extended ? with an ?a priori? absolute certainty ? to systems containing inertial and/or gravitational active elements. That limitation is a draw-back of the fact that neither inertia nor gravitation was, till now, experimentally checked on a possible Fitzgerald-Lorentz invariance. At this aim two sorts of experiences ? one determined by gravity and inertia, the second by inertia alone ? are suggested and theoretically investigated by computational modeling. Approximate quantitative results are worked out via finite difference approximation run in an Excel programs.[[Category:Scientific Paper]]

[[Category:Relativity]]